2022
DOI: 10.1029/2022jd036659
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of CMIP6 GCMs Over the CONUS for Downscaling Studies

Abstract: Global Climate Models (GCMs) are physics-based tools to study Earth system responses to natural climate variability and anthropogenically driven increases in greenhouse gas emissions and radiative forcing. Using a common set of future radiative pathways, the Coupled Model Intercomparison Projects (CMIP; Eyring et al., 2016) provide an extensive suite of GCM simulations through an international collaborative effort. Since its inception in 1995, not only have the number of GCMs participating in CMIP efforts incr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This ensemble data set used multiple combinations of global climate models, downscaling methods, and reference meteorological forcings that allowed for further uncertainty quantification. Within the multi‐model ensemble, 6 GCMs were selected from over 50 CMIP6 GCM simulations based on their data availability (for both dynamical and statistical downscaling), climate sensitivity, skillfulness, and independence (Table 1) (Ashfaq et al., 2022). The highest greenhouse gas (GHG) emission scenario, SSP585, was selected since it provides a worst‐case scenario, where fossil fuels would continue to be used without restriction (O'Neill et al., 2016).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This ensemble data set used multiple combinations of global climate models, downscaling methods, and reference meteorological forcings that allowed for further uncertainty quantification. Within the multi‐model ensemble, 6 GCMs were selected from over 50 CMIP6 GCM simulations based on their data availability (for both dynamical and statistical downscaling), climate sensitivity, skillfulness, and independence (Table 1) (Ashfaq et al., 2022). The highest greenhouse gas (GHG) emission scenario, SSP585, was selected since it provides a worst‐case scenario, where fossil fuels would continue to be used without restriction (O'Neill et al., 2016).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, ESMs such as EC-Earth3-Veg tend to describe the most relevant climate feedback mechanisms and provide more thorough uncertainty measurements than global circulation models (GCMs) [ 50 ]. Whereas using an ensemble of future climate models is generally employed when fitting SDMs for larger regions to minimize individual model bias, we chose a single ESM that is shown to perform best for the small region we are modeling [ 51 ]. Using an ensemble that incorporates numerous GCMs/ESMs over a small region like a single state can skew predictions [ 51 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas using an ensemble of future climate models is generally employed when fitting SDMs for larger regions to minimize individual model bias, we chose a single ESM that is shown to perform best for the small region we are modeling [ 51 ]. Using an ensemble that incorporates numerous GCMs/ESMs over a small region like a single state can skew predictions [ 51 ]. SSP 585 is a future climate scenario that describes the expected baseline high greenhouse gas impact resulting from a lack of carbon emission mitigation policies [ 52 ], i.e., a “worst case” scenario.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data for the climate prediction are generated for four scenarios of shared socioeconomic pathways (SSP): Low greenhouse gas emissions (SSP1-2.6), intermediate greenhouse gas emissions (SSP2-4.5), high greenhouse gas emissions (SSP3-7.0), and very high greenhouse gas emissions (SSP5-8.5) (Pörtner et al, 2022). All climatic prediction data were generated from an ensemble model consisting of 10 individual climate models with the lowest average weighted normalized relative error for the continental United States (Ashfaq et al, 2022;Fick & Hijmans, 2017;Vano et al, 2015). Historic temperature and precipitation data were gathered from WorldClim, based on observed measurements available from 1970 to 2000 (see Supporting Information).…”
Section: Estimating Climate Change Effects At Npgs Genebank Sitesmentioning
confidence: 99%