2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2005.09.051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of DGT as a metal speciation tool in wastewater

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
40
1
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
3
40
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…1) demonstrated that Zn, Ni, Cd and Co were the four metals with concentrations more similar than those obtained in ultrapure water. Recovery values obtained for these metals were close to 100% (±10%) in both matrices and deployment times; these results agree with previously published results (Denney et al 1999;Buzier et al 2006b). In terms of precision, the RSD (%) values obtained for these metals were lower or equal than those obtained in ultrapure water.…”
Section: Study Of Dgt Device In River and Treated Water: Matrix Ef Fectsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…1) demonstrated that Zn, Ni, Cd and Co were the four metals with concentrations more similar than those obtained in ultrapure water. Recovery values obtained for these metals were close to 100% (±10%) in both matrices and deployment times; these results agree with previously published results (Denney et al 1999;Buzier et al 2006b). In terms of precision, the RSD (%) values obtained for these metals were lower or equal than those obtained in ultrapure water.…”
Section: Study Of Dgt Device In River and Treated Water: Matrix Ef Fectsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…For instance, it is likely that DOM also plays a protective role on the biofilm micro-organisms in the biofilm suspensions as has previously been shown (Campbell 1995;Morel 1983)-more recently such a protective role of anthropic DOM from filtered wastewater samples on Daphnia magna was also uncovered (Buzier et al 2006). However in complex, heavily-loaded biofilm suspensions, it is likely that the metal/particles equilibrium is predominant.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…As an infinite sink for metals, metal binding to the DGT device could continue uninhibited, whereas in adverse conditions such as metal toxicity in soil, already alluded to, metal uptake by plants can be regulated through the mechanism of homeostasis. There is also some evidence showing that DGT could accumulate some amounts of inert organic complexes of metals (Buzier et al 2006), as is possible in these garden fields irrigated with wastewater, and with relatively high OC. Such organic complexes of the metals are not readily bioavailable as the inorganic complexes.…”
Section: Dgt Measured Metal Concentration and Plant Uptakementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Metal uptake by plants subjected to toxic concentration had often decreased, whereas metal binding to DGT resin might not (Almas et al 2006), thereby leading to negative and complicated relationship between CE and plant metal uptake. As a passive sink in soil, the DGT may not be effective in capturing the dynamics of nutrient uptake which is an active process (Buzier et al 2006;Cattani et al 2006). As an infinite sink for metals, metal binding to the DGT device could continue uninhibited, whereas in adverse conditions such as metal toxicity in soil, already alluded to, metal uptake by plants can be regulated through the mechanism of homeostasis.…”
Section: Dgt Measured Metal Concentration and Plant Uptakementioning
confidence: 99%