2013
DOI: 10.1007/s13197-013-1024-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of different DNA extraction methods for the detection of adulteration in raw and processed meat through polymerase chain reaction—restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These values meet criteria of linearity curve, while the amplification efficiency at 74.5% exceeds the criteria in Bio-Rad (2006), namely 90-110%. The low efficiency values can be caused by lack of pipetting precision and DNA extraction methods (Muhammed et al, 2015). , using isolate DNA from fresh rat tissue…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These values meet criteria of linearity curve, while the amplification efficiency at 74.5% exceeds the criteria in Bio-Rad (2006), namely 90-110%. The low efficiency values can be caused by lack of pipetting precision and DNA extraction methods (Muhammed et al, 2015). , using isolate DNA from fresh rat tissue…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The R 2 obtained is 0.910 and E = 64.0%. The low value of E can be caused by lack of pipetting precision and DNA extraction methods (Muhammed et al, 2015). Repeatability test demonstrated the amplification of all positive response samples containing porcine DNA in serial dilution (10000-1 pg).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If amplification efficiency values are higher than 100%, the thermocycling conditions and the reactions occurring in PCR components are less than optimal (Life Technologies, 2012). Efficiency values can be influenced by several factors, namely the presence of inhibitors in the master mix PCR, the purity of the reagents used, inconsistencies in the small volume piping process-which results in low accuracy, and the testing ability that depends on the primer specificity and target sequence length of the printed DNA (Svec et al, 2015;Muhammed et al, 2015). Extremely high efficiency indicates that the target DNA duplicated in each cycle is disturbed by the presence of an inhibitor during the reaction, whereas too small efficiency values represent imperfect primer attachment.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%