1987
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-0736(87)80088-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of electrocardiographic criteria for left ventricular hypertrophy based on anatomical comparison

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some studies have found the QRS voltage to be significantly increased [17][18][19] , others have found a nonsignificant trend of increase in QRS amplitude 20 , whereas some others have found the amplitude to be decreased in SHR compared with that in normotensive rats [21][22][23] . The high number of so-called false negative ECG results and low sensitivity of ECG voltage criteria in clinical diagnostics is also well documented [24][25][26][27] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Some studies have found the QRS voltage to be significantly increased [17][18][19] , others have found a nonsignificant trend of increase in QRS amplitude 20 , whereas some others have found the amplitude to be decreased in SHR compared with that in normotensive rats [21][22][23] . The high number of so-called false negative ECG results and low sensitivity of ECG voltage criteria in clinical diagnostics is also well documented [24][25][26][27] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Of particular relevance here is the high proportion of false-negatives, resulting in a low sensitivity of voltage criteria in LVH detection 25 . Reported sensitivities are mostly below 50%, ranging to 20%, or even lower [26][27][28] . It means, on the other hand, that the percentage of false-negative results is over 50%, up to 80% and even more.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%