2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.proenv.2014.03.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Energy Self-sufficient Village by Means of Emergy Indices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…SIA and SROI focus and emphasizes on the need to measure value from the bottom up, including the perspective of different stakeholders. Hence, there is a novelty issue for biogas project as most previous studies about biogas were focused on technical, economic, environmental and policy issues [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. The SROI value more than 1 may not presents the high or acceptable benefits of the project like benefit cost ratio of cost benefit analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SIA and SROI focus and emphasizes on the need to measure value from the bottom up, including the perspective of different stakeholders. Hence, there is a novelty issue for biogas project as most previous studies about biogas were focused on technical, economic, environmental and policy issues [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. The SROI value more than 1 may not presents the high or acceptable benefits of the project like benefit cost ratio of cost benefit analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this way, a quantitative accounting may be set up, thanks to the definition of suitable indicators able to describe the various aspects of the system at issue, pointing out its mode of operation and thus the possible leverage points, criticalities, sustainability and resilience. Emergy analysis was successfully applied to quite a wide range of systems, from the whole geobiosphere ( Odum, 1996) to human communities ( Lei, Wang & Ton, 2008;Listyawati, Meidiana & Anggraeni, 2014), Countries ( Geng et al, 2013), productive sectors ( Viglia et al, 2011), ecosystems ( Franzese, Brown & Ulgiati, 2014), social sectors ( Campbell, Lu & Kolb, 2010), industrial plants ( Geng et al, 2010), economic processes ( Brown, Cohen & Sweeney, 2009;Brown & Ulgiati, 2011;Campbell & Tilley, 2014). By accounting for all the investments, emergy analysis is in principle suitable to be applied to the description of a whole system as well as of any of its subsystems, at the same time without losing the information on the entirety, in so overcoming the bias of several analyses focused on specific aspects such as the economic, environmental or social ones.…”
Section: Emergy Modern Warfare and Systemic Casualtiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since cost of biogas constructions is unaffordable for traditional dairy farmers, lack of funding becomes main reason for potential biogas users to reject adopting biogas (Listyawati, Meidiana, & Anggraeni 2014). Without considering the interest of investment, the simple pay-back period of biogas investment in Indonesia is 4-6 years (Widodoet al 2009;Rosyidi et al 2014) or even the investment is not able to meet economic feasibility (Budiarto et al 2013).…”
Section: Financial Supportmentioning
confidence: 99%