2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.suscom.2014.09.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of genetic algorithms using discrete and continuous methods for pump optimization of water distribution systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Pollutant Emission Pump Station Optimization (PEPSO) is a platform developed by the water research team at Wayne State University for optimizing the pump schedule of the WDS [16]. The initial version of PEPSO used weighting factors to calculate a single combined objective from electricity usage, pollutant emissions and penalties [22]. However, the newer version of this tool is equipped with a multi-objective optimization algorithm to optimize each objective independent of others and find the Pareto frontiers of solutions.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pollutant Emission Pump Station Optimization (PEPSO) is a platform developed by the water research team at Wayne State University for optimizing the pump schedule of the WDS [16]. The initial version of PEPSO used weighting factors to calculate a single combined objective from electricity usage, pollutant emissions and penalties [22]. However, the newer version of this tool is equipped with a multi-objective optimization algorithm to optimize each objective independent of others and find the Pareto frontiers of solutions.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The optimization algorithm chosen for the optimization in this paper is a single objective genetic algorithm (GA). Although the new toolkit EPANET2-ETTAR could be linked to any optimization algorithm that requires an external hydraulic software to simulate the solutions, GAs have been selected as they have been extensively applied to water distribution system problems (Goldberg and Kuo, 1987;Savic et al 1997;Kazantzis et al 2002;Sadatiyan Abkenar et al 2014). Here it is important to note that, as with many other evolutionary algorithms, GAs require a set of parameters (population size, Pop.Size, maximum number of iterations, No.Gen, probability of crossover, Pc, and probability of mutation, Pm) and the specification of the type of selection, crossover and mutation operators.…”
Section: Case Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A large part of the research has studied the minimization of operational costs (e.g. Ormsbee and Lansey, 1994;Mackle et al 1995;Kazantzis et al 2002;van Zyl et al 2004;López-Ibáñez et al 2008;Behandisha andWu, 2014, Ibarra andArnal 2014) and, more recently, the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions in order to reduce the environmental impact caused by the energy production (Wu et al 2012a(Wu et al , 2012bSadatiyan Abkenar et al 2014;Stokes et al 2014). The optimization of pump operation has also been studied in conjunction with water quality (Mala-Jetmarova et al 2015) and network leakage (Price and Ostfeld, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In GA, each solution is described as a group of chromosomes which contain a string of genes that corresponds to the controls of pressure for a pump during running period [4]. The purpose of pump optimization is to reduce efficiency deviation.…”
Section: The Optimization Principle Of Hydraulic Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%