2015
DOI: 10.4238/2015.october.19.11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of grain yield in sorghum hybrids under water stress

Abstract: ABSTRACT. Sorghum grain yield can be significantly affected by climatic changes, especially drought and high temperature. The purpose of this study was to evaluate hybrids of grain sorghum grown under normal irrigation conditions or water stress in order to select those likely to be more tolerant of drought. Forty-nine hybrids were grown in a randomized block design experiment, with three replications. The plots consisted of four rows of 5 m length. Grain yield, weight of 1000 grains, harvest index, days to fl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
13
1
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
2
13
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite being among the most drought tolerant cereals, the sorghum plant can suffer significant damage during its development, under strong water stress (Reddy et al, 2011;Menezes et al, 2015). Sorghum damage caused by drought stress is greater during reproductive stages than during the vegetative stage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Despite being among the most drought tolerant cereals, the sorghum plant can suffer significant damage during its development, under strong water stress (Reddy et al, 2011;Menezes et al, 2015). Sorghum damage caused by drought stress is greater during reproductive stages than during the vegetative stage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sorghum breeding must consider the unpredictability of the environment during the off-season, selecting hybrids that are tolerant to drought and efficient in nutrient uptake. Also, the genotypes x environments and genotype x year interactions play an important role in the phenotypic expression of the drought tolerance (Menezes et al, 2015;Batista et al, 2017). Therefore, for efficient selection for rought tolerance it is essential to evaluate genotypes in different years and locations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This significant decrease in the grain yield/ha might be due to the adversely effects of the irrigation wa-ter stress on the physiological, biochemical and metabolism procedures within the plants. Water stress reduces photosynthesis; the most important physiological processes that regulate development and productivity of plants (Menezes et al, 2015;Hamza et al, 2016). The reductions in seed yield components due to the decrease in irrigation water supply might be due to the decline in plant height, leaf gas exchange and leaf area, which resulted in reduction of photosynthetic level due to the unavailability of water nutrients in the soil (Ghaafar et al, 2014;Bandani et al, 2014).…”
Section: Effect Of Irrigation Water Regimes On Yield and Yield Componmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, grain sorghum tolerates and avoids drought more than many other cereal crops, but the drought response of sorghum does not come without a yield loss. Menezes et al, (2015) evaluated forty-nine hybrids of grain sorghum under normal irrigation conditions or water stress in order to select those likely to be more tolerant of drought. Grain yield, weight of 1000 grains, harvest index, days to flowering, and plant height were affected by water stress; however, grain yield showed the largest relative reduction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Drought stress during early vegetative growth stage (GS) 1 through 3 can be significant but often occurs less frequently in production settings (Vanderlip and Reeves, 1972). Most studies have focused on latter stages of development: GS5 from panicle differentiation to flowering and GS9 from the beginning of grain fill through grain maturity (Borrell and Hammer, 2000, Borrell et al, 1999, 2000a, 2000b; Burke et al, 2013, 2010; Chapman et al, 2000; Crasta et al, 1999; Dev Sharma et al, 2006; Fracasso et al, 2016; Garrity et al, 1984; Girma and Krieg, 1992; Harris et al, 2007; Haussmann et al, 2002, 1999, 2000, 1998; Henzell et al, 1976; Jedmowski et al, 2014; Johnson et al, 2014; Kannangara et al, 1982; Kapanigowda et al, 2013; Kassahun et al, 2010; Kebede et al, 2001; Mahalakshmi and Bidinger, 2002; Manjarrez‐Sandoval et al, 1989; Menezes et al, 2015; Muchow and Sinclair, 1989; Peng and Krieg, 1992; Prasad et al, 2015; Rosenow and Clark, 1982; Rosenow et al, 1996, 1983; Sanchez et al, 2002; Stout et al, 1978; Tenkouano et al, 1993; Tuinstra et al, 1997; Wang et al, 2015; Wright et al, 1983a, 1983b, Xu et al, 2000). Marked responses to water‐deficit stress at GS5 are often seen as leaf rolling, uncharacteristic leaf erectness, leaf bleaching, leaf tip and margin burn, delayed flowering, saddle effect, poor panicle exertion, panicle blasting and floret abortion, and reduced panicle size.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%