2020
DOI: 10.18178/ijmlc.2020.10.2.939
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Group Modelling Strategy in Model-Based Collaborative Filtering Recommendation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We observe optimum value when group size is 10, which is same as of Nawi et al . [ 25 ] where it is calculated through elbow method. For the group size greater than 15, the HTGF shows almost constant results better than existing schemes which experience performance degradation above group size 10, and hence their graphs are not included in the figure.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…We observe optimum value when group size is 10, which is same as of Nawi et al . [ 25 ] where it is calculated through elbow method. For the group size greater than 15, the HTGF shows almost constant results better than existing schemes which experience performance degradation above group size 10, and hence their graphs are not included in the figure.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The matrix splitting and estimation procedure of ALS results in low accuracy as compared to SVD that splits the matrices into three sub-matrices. Moreover, the ALS and SVD experience degradation in recommendation quality as they fail to capture the implicit preferences of individuals participating in a group [ 25 ]. However, our proposed model based on NCF takes into account the latent feature vectors of users and movies which minimizes the error rate as compared to ALS and SVD.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations