2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.sab.2007.07.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of liquid chromatography inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry for arsenic speciation in water from industrial treatment of shale

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…So, five groundwater samples were analyzed for arsenic speciation by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) for separation and inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICPMS) for detection, employing a methodology described previously in the literature [30]. A volume of the filtered sample solution was injected in a LC system assembled with a quaternary pump (Model Series 200, PerkinElmer), a 200 L sample loop and a separation column (Dionex, IonPac AS14,250 × 4 mm i.d.)…”
Section: Comparison Of the Results With Hplc-icpmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So, five groundwater samples were analyzed for arsenic speciation by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) for separation and inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICPMS) for detection, employing a methodology described previously in the literature [30]. A volume of the filtered sample solution was injected in a LC system assembled with a quaternary pump (Model Series 200, PerkinElmer), a 200 L sample loop and a separation column (Dionex, IonPac AS14,250 × 4 mm i.d.)…”
Section: Comparison Of the Results With Hplc-icpmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, the PRP-X00 column was used for separation of the organic and inorganic arsenic species in the rest of this study, and the chromatographic conditions were optimized by adjusting the composition, flow rate, and elution gradient of the mobile phase. Based on an early study [47], we first tested (NH 4 ) 2 CO 3 (10-100 mM) as the elution buffer. However, the results showed that ASA and ROX could not be eluted from the column within 30 min under the conditions listed in Table 3, due to the weak elution ability of the (NH 4 ) 2 CO 3 solution [48][49][50][51][52] (Fig.…”
Section: Optimization Of Analytical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…used a three times SD approach for LOD value calculation. Despite increasing the sample injection volume even to as high as 100 μL, or 200 μL, almost none of the authors obtained similar results to those presented by Ronkart et al . The lowest values obtained with the use of a larger sample injection volume were 0.03 µg L –1 for As(III), 0.027 µg L –1 for As(V), 0.035 µg L –1 for MMA, 0.011 µg L –1 for DMA, and 0.01 µg L –1 for AsB .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 51%