2016
DOI: 10.1111/jam.13075
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of micro-organism-detaching efficacy from meat samples by spindle or stomacher treatment and quality analysis of suspensions

Abstract: The Spindle could be an alternative method for detaching micro-organisms, yielding a higher quality of suspensions which may be better suited for further molecular microbiological analysis.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, no phages were recovered from the stomached samples. It is important to note that Stomachers are designed for roughly homogenising (typically food) samples in order to permit microbiological profiling [25]. Therefore, they are not an appropriate apparatus to generate the desired peristaltic force.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, no phages were recovered from the stomached samples. It is important to note that Stomachers are designed for roughly homogenising (typically food) samples in order to permit microbiological profiling [25]. Therefore, they are not an appropriate apparatus to generate the desired peristaltic force.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, the spindle has several advantages over the stomacher and sterile cotton swab. The stomacher disintegrates almost the entire food structure resulting in a turbid suspension, but the spindle produces a very clear diluent which can be used for further studies such as BCA (bicinchoninic acid) protein assay or RT-PCR (Kim et al , 2016). Moreover, a sterile cotton swab has less effectiveness for recovery of bacterial cell populations and takes considerable time and energy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%