2011
DOI: 10.13031/2013.38197
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Modern Cotton Harvest Systems on Irrigated Cotton: Fiber Quality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
22
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Sample locations and methods were described in detail by Faulkner et al (2011a). The ginning machinery sequence was similar for both harvest methods were similar for both harvest treatments and were described by Faulkner et al (2011b). A minimum of 23 kg (50 lb) of lint from each sample was processed into yarn at the Fiber and Biopolymer Research Institute in Lubbock, Texas.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Sample locations and methods were described in detail by Faulkner et al (2011a). The ginning machinery sequence was similar for both harvest methods were similar for both harvest treatments and were described by Faulkner et al (2011b). A minimum of 23 kg (50 lb) of lint from each sample was processed into yarn at the Fiber and Biopolymer Research Institute in Lubbock, Texas.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The recent increases in cotton yields on the High Plains coupled with a change in market demands have raised interest in picker harvesters in the region because picker harvesters are perceived to maintain fiber quality characteristics better than strippers, and may be able to harvest cotton at higher speeds in high yielding stands. Previous research by Faulkner et al (2011b) has demonstrated that picking cotton may result in better fiber quality and lint value than stripping, but the magnitude of those differences are a function of growing conditions and/or fiber maturity. The paper by Faulkner et al (2011b) also summarized other literature comparing the fiber quality of picked and stripped cottons.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…63 of December 5, 2002 from MAPA (BRASIL, 2002), the UI both in the absence (83.59%) and in the presence of scraping plates (84.36%) was also high (Table 3). Faulkner et al (2011) evaluated mechanized harvesting systems with a picker platform and observed UI values of 80.4%, showing that the speed does not influence the intrinsic properties of the cotton fiber quality, in years with ideal growing conditions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…De acordo com a Instrução Normativa n° 63, de 05 de dezembro de 2002, do MAPA (Brasil, 2002), a uniformidade de comprimento foi considerada Alta (83 a 85%) e, segundo a norma ASTM (2012a) D1447, foi considerada elevada (83 a 85%). Faulkner et al (2011) avaliaram os sistemas mecanizados de colheita e observaram diferenças das Unf, de 80,4 (picker) para 79,4 (stripper). Neste experimento, não houve redução da Unf para os sistemas de colheita mecanizados.…”
Section: Resultsunclassified