2011
DOI: 10.1249/mss.0b013e3181e5797d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Neural Networks to Identify Types of Activity Using Accelerometers

Abstract: Relatively simple ANN models perform well in identifying the type but not the speed of the activity of adults from accelerometer data.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
92
2
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
92
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In a study carried out by De Vries et al a series of ANNs were developed to predict PA in children across a range of activity types. However, the results reported were significantly lower than those reported in Staudenmayer et al [37] with classification accuracies between 57.2% and 76.8% [30], [31].…”
Section: Physical Activity Classificationcontrasting
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In a study carried out by De Vries et al a series of ANNs were developed to predict PA in children across a range of activity types. However, the results reported were significantly lower than those reported in Staudenmayer et al [37] with classification accuracies between 57.2% and 76.8% [30], [31].…”
Section: Physical Activity Classificationcontrasting
confidence: 66%
“…Data from 100 children was used, comprising of data for 12 activities each of child performed. The best performing design was trained using features extracted from a range of time windows (10,15,20,30 and 60 seconds). This rigorous methodology yielded particularly good results, with the most successful network able to predict PA type with 88.4% accuracy over a 60-second window.…”
Section: Physical Activity Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a study carried out by De Vries et al, a series of ANNs were developed to predict PA in children across a range of activity types. However, the results reported were significantly lower than those reported in (Staudenmayer et al, 2009) with classification accuracies between 57.2% and 76.8% (De Vries et al, 2011;De Vries, Garre, Engbers, H., & Van Buuren, 2001). …”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 64%
“…6,8,9,14 Machine learning has experienced an increase in popularity in sporting and exercise research, with applications such as the prediction of competition outcome 15 and quantification of movement activity types. 16,17 This increase in popularity has stemmed from the potential ability of these approaches to account for nonlinearity within datasets and thus display improved performance. 18 Therefore, implementation of such approaches may help to better understand TL at the individual level, thus increasing the accuracy in understanding the relationship between internal and external load, and thus, athlete management.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%