Evaluation of periodontal indices among non-smokers, tobacco, and e-cigarette smokers: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Abstract

Objectives The detrimental effect of tobacco smoking on periodontal health is well known, while the effect of electronic cigarette on periodontal parameters has been less investigated. The aim of the present systematic review was to compare periodontal indices in three categories of patients: traditional cigarette smokers (TS), e-cigarette smokers (ES), and non-smokers (NS). Materials and methods An electronic search was conducted for studies published until December 2021 on MEDLINE (PubMed), ISI Web of Science, and Scopus. A hand search was additionally conducted. Clinical observational and cross-sectional trials investigating periodontal indices among tobacco smokers (TS), electronic cigarette smokers (ES) and non-smokers (NS) were included and selected by 2 independent reviewers. Data on probing depth (PD), plaque index (PI), and bleeding on probing (BOP) were collected. The risk of bias was evaluated according to the NIH quality assessment tool and a network meta-analysis (NMA) was undertaken. Results Five relevant studies, from 707 identified, were included. Overall, 512 patients were included, of them 170 were NS, 176 were TS, and 166 were ES. A significant difference in the comparison among TS vs NS: effect size (ES) = 3.297 (95%CI: [2.142–4.454], p = 0.001) and TS and ES ES = 2.507 (95%CI: [1.351–3.663], p = 0.001) was identified for PD. A significant difference in the comparison among TS and NS, ES = 21.34 (95%CI: [13.41–29.27], p = 0.001) and between TS and ES ES = 15.67 (95%CI: [7.73–23.62], p = 0.001) was identified for PI. The analysis of BOP values shows a significant difference in the comparison among ES and NS: ES = − 16.22 (95%CI: [− 22.85 to − 9.59], p < 0.001) and between TS and NS: ES = − 14.47 (95%CI: [− 21.103 to − 7.848], p < 0.001). Based on the SUCRA ranking, NS showed the most favorable outcome for PD and PI, followed by ES. Tobacco smokers were clearly in the last position. Dealing with BoP ES showed the most favorable outcome, followed by TS. NS were in the last position. Conclusions Periodontal parameters were similar among NS and ES, while TS presented the worst indices. BoP was reduced both in ES and in TS. Clinical relevance Results of the present review suggest a reduced effect on periodontal tissue of e-cig smoking compared to traditional cigarettes, despite recent studies proved that e-cig smoking increases oxidative stress, inflammatory responses, change in pulmonary cellular behavior, and stimulates DNA injury.

Evidence pertaining to modifiable risk factors for oral diseases: an umbrella review to Inform oral health messages for Australia

“…Six systematic reviews, all moderate quality, examined the impact of conventional tobacco smoking and/or e‐cigarette use on a range of oral health outcomes 8,32–36 …”

An Analysis of Different Techniques Used to Seal Post-Extractive Sites—A Preliminary Report

“…Our results suggested that smoking and reasons of extraction had no relation to the Healing Index; however, it must be pointed out that the number smoked cigarettes and the type of smoking (traditional vs. electronic) was not registered, and this could have influenced the results [ 71 ]. Dealing with the reason of extraction, it must be underlined that all patients assumed an antibiotic therapy that could have influenced the results.…”

The influence of smoking on the periodontal biome. A review.

“…Nicotine generates contraction of vascular endothelial cells, making gingivitis less clinically evident furthermore it reduces crevicular fluid and immune cells. Untreated, gingivitis easily passes into the periodontitis stage [17].…”