2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.eja.2014.05.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of pixel- and object-based approaches for mapping wild oat (Avena sterilis) weed patches in wheat fields using QuickBird imagery for site-specific management

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
61
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
61
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The mapping of weeds has been addressed by most previous works by detecting weeds at late growth stage (e.g. flowering) using piloted aircrafts or QuickBird satellite imagery (Castillejo-González et al, 2014;Gutiérrez et al, 2008), although the spatial resolution of these platforms is not 35 suitable for seedling detection (pixel size around 50 cm and 2.6 m for piloted aircrafts and QuickBird satellite, respectively). Nonetheless, a new aerial platform has recently joined the traditional ones, known as the Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) (Moranduzzo & Melgani, 2014).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mapping of weeds has been addressed by most previous works by detecting weeds at late growth stage (e.g. flowering) using piloted aircrafts or QuickBird satellite imagery (Castillejo-González et al, 2014;Gutiérrez et al, 2008), although the spatial resolution of these platforms is not 35 suitable for seedling detection (pixel size around 50 cm and 2.6 m for piloted aircrafts and QuickBird satellite, respectively). Nonetheless, a new aerial platform has recently joined the traditional ones, known as the Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) (Moranduzzo & Melgani, 2014).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In land cover classification, OBIA, which has become common in the last decade, has proven to be superior to other methods of classification [101,139,155]. OBIA produced high classification accuracies in most studies which were based on Landsat images for different land cover types; however, OBIA'has limitations such as choosing the appropriate segmentation scale and dealing with different steps, which can be a source of variation if not properly handled [94].…”
Section: Best Practices For Landsat Land Cover Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The computation speed of the inter-row weed detection algorithm was higher than the Hough transformation method. Castillejo-González et al [15] compared and tested the pixel-based and object-based techniques with different classification algorithms, for mapping the weed patches in the wheat fields using multi-spectral satellite image. The pixel-based classifications were applied to the wheat fields.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%