2020
DOI: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1104_19
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of root coverage with pedicled buccal fat pad in class III and class IV gingival recession defects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Conventional implants with a thin soft-tissue phenotypes, required subepithelial or free connective tissue graft to prevent the development of peri-implant mucosal dehiscence ( 22 , 23 ). In addition, based on current knowledge, the buccal fat pad has been successfully used to cover tooth recessions ( 24 , 25 ). Hence, from other perspective but following with a similar investigation line, the present study showed that peri-implant buccal mucosal dehiscence was significantly worse in those implants that were not covered with the buccal fat pad.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conventional implants with a thin soft-tissue phenotypes, required subepithelial or free connective tissue graft to prevent the development of peri-implant mucosal dehiscence ( 22 , 23 ). In addition, based on current knowledge, the buccal fat pad has been successfully used to cover tooth recessions ( 24 , 25 ). Hence, from other perspective but following with a similar investigation line, the present study showed that peri-implant buccal mucosal dehiscence was significantly worse in those implants that were not covered with the buccal fat pad.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Sample size Diagnosis Location of recession Amount of AG Reduction in the gingival recession Clinical attachment gain % MRC Amount of increase in KG (PPD After) – (PPD before) Monika, et al. 2020 [ 46 ] 15 Miller's Class III & IV Maxillary posterior teeth N/A 2.73 mm 0.87 mm 46.78% 1–2 mm -0.8 m Deepa, et al. 2018 [ 47 ] 10 Miller's Class II & III Maxillary posterior teeth 2.5 mm 5.70 mm N/A 89.30% N/A 1 mm Panda, et al.…”
Section: Surgical Techniques For Treating Miller's Class Iii/iv (Adva...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the one hand, it has biological implementation at different ages of the patient, and on the other hand, it can be used in small and large reconstructive surgical procedures, especially in the maxillofacial region [3]. These include the repair of oral cavity defects after resective surgeries, closure of clefts of the hard and soft palate, treatment of peri-implantitis and repair of defects around dental implants, and the management of tooth recessions and OAC [4], as well as in the treatment of temporomandibular joint ankylosis [5][6][7][8][9], congenital pathologies, jawbone necrosis, and postoperative reconstructions in cancer patients [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%