2018
DOI: 10.1029/2018ms001389
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Simulated Snow and Snowmelt Timing in the Community Land Model Using Satellite‐Based Products and Streamflow Observations

Abstract: The purpose of this study was to evaluate snow and snowmelt simulated by version 4 of the Community Land Model (CLM4). We performed uncoupled CLM4 simulations, forced by Modern‐Era Retrospective Analysis for Research and Applications Land‐only meteorological fields. GlobSnow snow cover fraction, snow water equivalent (SWE), and satellite‐based passive microwave snowmelt‐off day of year (MoD) data were used to evaluate snow cover fraction, SWE, and snowmelt simulations. Simulated runoff was then fed into a rive… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
17
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 90 publications
3
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…CLSM simulates the vertical water and energy transfers between the atmosphere, vegetation and soil, and HyMAP the surface water dynamics, including rivers and floodplains. CLSM has been widely used in the GRACE-DA context (e.g., Girotto et al, 2016;Girotto et al, 2017;Kumar et al, 2016;Li et al, 2012;Zaitchik et al, 2008), and HyMAP has been successfully used to simulate surface water dynamics in numerous applications worldwide (e.g., Getirana & Peters-Lidard, 2013;Getirana, Kumar et al, 2017;McNally et al, 2019) and to quantify the impacts of land surface parameterization and DA on streamflow (e.g., Getirana, Dutra, et al, 2014;Jung et al, 2017;Kumar et al, 2015;Toure et al, 2018). In this study, HyMAP and CLSM are one-way coupled.…”
Section: Modeling Framework and Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CLSM simulates the vertical water and energy transfers between the atmosphere, vegetation and soil, and HyMAP the surface water dynamics, including rivers and floodplains. CLSM has been widely used in the GRACE-DA context (e.g., Girotto et al, 2016;Girotto et al, 2017;Kumar et al, 2016;Li et al, 2012;Zaitchik et al, 2008), and HyMAP has been successfully used to simulate surface water dynamics in numerous applications worldwide (e.g., Getirana & Peters-Lidard, 2013;Getirana, Kumar et al, 2017;McNally et al, 2019) and to quantify the impacts of land surface parameterization and DA on streamflow (e.g., Getirana, Dutra, et al, 2014;Jung et al, 2017;Kumar et al, 2015;Toure et al, 2018). In this study, HyMAP and CLSM are one-way coupled.…”
Section: Modeling Framework and Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the enormous effort associated with data collection, the ability to capture representative snow depth patterns that accurately reflect grid‐cell averages and subgrid variability in forested environments has suffered from the poor extent and limited support of these measurements (Bloeschl, ; Pomeroy et al, ; Winkler & Moore, ). In contrast, validation efforts that use satellite products to evaluate large‐scale land surface models have strong limitations in forested environments (Toure et al, ). Consequently, identifying grid‐cell‐scale canopy structure metrics that can act as predictors of snow depth averages and variability remains a major challenge (Friesen et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Poor performance in basins such as Pechora, Lena, and Yenisey basins with NSE less than 0.3 are mainly caused by remarkable underestimation of streamflow, which is consistent with (Li et al, ) that simulation using the QIAN forcing generally has lower runoff and streamflow compared to simulations using other forcing data sets (e.g., GPCP, GPCC, and HYBAM) due to the larger bias in downward shortwave radiation in the QIAN forcing data set. The poor performance may also be partly related to human activities, which are not represented in the model, and poor representation of snowmelt timing by the model (Toure et al, ). Despite the lower runoff and streamflow magnitude, the simulated seasonal cycle is quite consistent with observations, so the simulation provides useful water balance information for analysis of flood generation mechanisms.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%