2010
DOI: 10.3103/s0147688210060043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the cognitive ergonomics of ontologies on the basis of graph analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While knowledge sharing speed, that is, the speed of the requested knowledge transfer from the knowledge holder to the requester, is a considerably clear and homogeneous category, knowledge sharing quality is much more complicated and can be divided into several subcategories. A considerable amount of structures of such subcategories has been suggested in the literature (Cabrera & Cabrera, 2002 ; Rumanti et al, 2018 ; Witherspoon et al, 2013 ); one of the possible high‐level classifications of knowledge quality criteria divides these into, for example, knowledge sharing fullness (i.e., does the knowledge holder transfer all the volume of the requested knowledge item) and adequacy (i.e., does the knowledge holder react to the knowledge sharing request by transferring exactly that knowledge item that is being requested) (Blagov et al, 2020 ; Doronin et al, 2020 ; Gavrilova et al, 2012 ; Younis & Adel, 2020 ).…”
Section: Research Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While knowledge sharing speed, that is, the speed of the requested knowledge transfer from the knowledge holder to the requester, is a considerably clear and homogeneous category, knowledge sharing quality is much more complicated and can be divided into several subcategories. A considerable amount of structures of such subcategories has been suggested in the literature (Cabrera & Cabrera, 2002 ; Rumanti et al, 2018 ; Witherspoon et al, 2013 ); one of the possible high‐level classifications of knowledge quality criteria divides these into, for example, knowledge sharing fullness (i.e., does the knowledge holder transfer all the volume of the requested knowledge item) and adequacy (i.e., does the knowledge holder react to the knowledge sharing request by transferring exactly that knowledge item that is being requested) (Blagov et al, 2020 ; Doronin et al, 2020 ; Gavrilova et al, 2012 ; Younis & Adel, 2020 ).…”
Section: Research Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This circumstance, first of all, is caused by the impossibility of their practical application to solve the identified issues due to the existing features of the topological organization of the formed decomposition structures of technologies (DST) [6]. In this regard, we propose our own set of indicators of formalized description quality and analysis of technologies, obtained on the basis of studying the topology of the obtained ontological representations [7], which is quite consistent with the general approaches implemented in this field [8] - [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Evaluating of the proposed ontology, the Ontology cognitive ergonomics evaluation based on graph topology (Gavrilova et al, 2010a(Gavrilova et al, , 2010bOntoeval) is implemented to analyze the structure of the ontology. The aim of this evaluation method is to assess ontology balance and its perception by humans.…”
Section: Ontology Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yngve-Miller shows percentage of concepts node and number of links which is hard or easy to perceive by humans. The greater percentage value, the ontology is easy to perceive by humans (Gavrilova et al, 2010a(Gavrilova et al, , 2010b.…”
Section: Ontology Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation