2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10142-021-00788-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the differences between biofilm and planktonic Brucella abortus via metabolomics and proteomics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Next, we assessed the contribution of ftcR to biofilm formation under stress. To examine whether the biofilms formed by Δ ftcR could resist a range of hyperosmotic environmental stresses, we improved the B. abortus biofilm development method established by Tang et al [ 14 ]. First, we grew biofilms under various stress conditions for 20 d. After normalizing the biomass to the untreated control of each strain, we identified three strains with similar relative reductions in biomass after treatment with the osmotic solute.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Next, we assessed the contribution of ftcR to biofilm formation under stress. To examine whether the biofilms formed by Δ ftcR could resist a range of hyperosmotic environmental stresses, we improved the B. abortus biofilm development method established by Tang et al [ 14 ]. First, we grew biofilms under various stress conditions for 20 d. After normalizing the biomass to the untreated control of each strain, we identified three strains with similar relative reductions in biomass after treatment with the osmotic solute.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We investigated the role of FtcR in the response of B. melitensis 16M biofilms to various conditions of environmental stress. Inconsistent with B. melitensis 16M in a planktonic state, the ftcR mutant showed a significant biofilm growth defect compared with that of the WT and complemented strains only under hyperosmotic stress; B. melitensis 16M did not show the same susceptibility to other stressors as the planktonic bacteria of the Δ ftcR strain, possibly highlighting the difference in the protective effects of the biofilm structure on bacteria and the bacteria in the planktonic state [ 11 , 14 , 15 ]. This biofilm phenotype was not a response to high concentrations of NaCl alone, because it was also observed when the biofilms were treated with other types of osmotic solutes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Metabolomics has been used to gain insight into the molecular mechanism of biofilm formation in other bacterial pathogens ( Yeom et al., 2013 ; Stipetic et al., 2016 ; Favre et al., 2018 ; Lu et al., 2019 ; Rieusset et al., 2020 ; Tang et al., 2021 ), but a comprehensive and quantitative analysis of metabolic changes involved in biofilm formation in P. aeruginosa is still missing ( Gjersing et al., 2007 ; Zhang and Powers, 2012 ; Borgos et al., 2015 ). Detailed elucidation of major shifts in metabolic pathways in planktonic versus biofilm phenotypes has the potential to identify mechanisms of metabolic regulation, new targets for prevention and mitigation, and specific metabolic signatures for diagnosis of biofilms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%