2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.01.045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the effect of water-uptake on the impedance of dental resins

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
25
0
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
3
25
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…13 The use of increasing concentrations of hydrophilic resins in contemporary dentin adhesives raises concern on whether such adhesives have become too hydrophilic. 14,15 Similar to the results derived from other biomedical fields, 16,17 incorporation of hydrophilic resin monomers results in increases in water sorption [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] and decreases in mechanical properties of these resins. [26][27][28] These hydrophilic resinous films are also highly permeable to water [29][30][31] that further expedite their hydrolysis.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…13 The use of increasing concentrations of hydrophilic resins in contemporary dentin adhesives raises concern on whether such adhesives have become too hydrophilic. 14,15 Similar to the results derived from other biomedical fields, 16,17 incorporation of hydrophilic resin monomers results in increases in water sorption [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] and decreases in mechanical properties of these resins. [26][27][28] These hydrophilic resinous films are also highly permeable to water [29][30][31] that further expedite their hydrolysis.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…This is probably attributed to the CDA presented on the outer surface of the CDA-incorporated resin. The profiles of chlorhexidine release from resin blends R1-R5, in general, corresponded with the changes in resistance and capacitance of thin resin films prepared from the same five resin blends [26]. The cumulative chlorhexidine release also correlated significantly with water sorption of the resin disks (Fig.5), which is indicative of swelling within the polymer matrix [27].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…This is probably the result of more severe swelling of the polymer network in the R5 resin by water intake. As a result of swelling, water channels were probably enlarged in the polymer [26], through which rapid diffusion of the water molecules was facilitated. Water would slowly elute CDA depending on its solubility in water and its diffusion coefficient through the resin matrix.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Water sorption is enhanced by the presence of hydrophilic and ionic resin monomers, [41][42] which, in turn, facilitate ion movement within a polymerized resin matrix. [42][43] This water movement causes hydrolytic degradation and likely leaching of the hydrolyzed components of porous dentin adhesive coatings with an associated increase in permeability, thus creating a vicious cycle that increases deterioration of the mechanical properties of the adhesive coatings. 44 If solvent is not adequately removed, it represents areas of incomplete polymerization and/or hydrogel formation within the adhesive layer, 30,44 similar to what could have occurred in the cold air-dried groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%