Modern Tunneling Science and Technology 2017
DOI: 10.1201/9780203746653-33
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the geological condition ahead of the tunnel face by geostatistical techniques using TBM driving data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…by Yamamoto et al (2003) and Sun et al (2018b). In particular, Sun et al (2018b) achieved a prediction accuracy of R 2 = 0.8 using RFs.…”
Section: Geological Forecastingmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…by Yamamoto et al (2003) and Sun et al (2018b). In particular, Sun et al (2018b) achieved a prediction accuracy of R 2 = 0.8 using RFs.…”
Section: Geological Forecastingmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…A further consideration is that the different conditions of each tunnelling site complicate the direct comparison of data. Nevertheless, many studies regarding TBM operation have been conducted using machine data accumulated from tunnelling sites, and there always has been demand for large quantities of machine data for TBM operators, engineers, and researchers [4,5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When using the TBM method, it is difficult to observe the tunnel face during the tunnelling process. Besides, it is difficult to obtain the geological conditions during the construction period, so such a method is proposed [1]. Li et al used a digital optical borehole camera to directly observe the gaps in the rock mass through predrilled holes [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%