2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2003.09.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the influence of muscle deactivation on other muscles and joints during gait motion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

7
17
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
7
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Since our focus is on muscle control compensations, such kinematic differences between treadmill and overground would not appear to influence on our results. Previous modeling studies have performed similar analyses of compensatory mechanisms [30,31], but no study has analyzed the entire gait cycle. Jonkers et al [30] used forward dynamics simulations and optimization to determine compensatory strategies present in the stance phase of gait as a result of the exclusion of SOL, GAS, HAM and GMAX.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since our focus is on muscle control compensations, such kinematic differences between treadmill and overground would not appear to influence on our results. Previous modeling studies have performed similar analyses of compensatory mechanisms [30,31], but no study has analyzed the entire gait cycle. Jonkers et al [30] used forward dynamics simulations and optimization to determine compensatory strategies present in the stance phase of gait as a result of the exclusion of SOL, GAS, HAM and GMAX.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar to the present study, they found that HAM and GMAX played an important role in compensating for one another as well as SOL and GAS, but that other compensations were necessary to completely compensate for the deactivation of these muscles. Komura et al [31] used an inverse dynamics-based analysis and static optimization to examine the interactions of 13 lower extremity muscles during the stance phase of gait by systematically deactivating each muscle, which produced similar results to those of Jonkers et al [30]. The results of our study build upon these previous analyses by examining the muscle mechanical energetics and compensatory mechanisms over the entire gait cycle associated with the clinically relevant impairments of reduced strength in specific muscle groups and increased hip joint stiffness.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ankle plantarflexor and hip flexor strategies would play complementary roles in swing initiation [17]. Indeed, a simulation study has shown that deactivation of the iliopsoas muscle increases the muscle force exerted by the gastrocnemius muscle during gait, and vice versa [18]. In the current study, because of the redistribution of muscle power by the walking exercise with decreased ankle pushoff, patients with THA would produce increased power of the hip flexors relative to the ankle plantarflexors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Moreover, the deactivation of the iliopsoas muscle can affect the impact on the ankle joint and force production of the triceps surae, as observed in a biomechanical study that evaluated the impact of muscle deactivation on the musculoskeletal system during gait motion. 21 Wainner et al 22 described the concept of regional interdependence, where seemingly unrelated impairments in a remote anatomical region may contribute to, or be associated with, the primary complaint of the patient.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%