2021
DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics10040468
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the MeroRisk Calculator, A User-Friendly Tool to Predict the Risk of Meropenem Target Non-Attainment in Critically Ill Patients

Abstract: Background: The MeroRisk-calculator, an easy-to-use tool to determine the risk of meropenem target non-attainment after standard dosing (1000 mg; q8h), uses a patient’s creatinine clearance and the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of the pathogen. In clinical practice, however, the MIC is rarely available. The objectives were to evaluate the MeroRisk-calculator and to extend risk assessment by including general pathogen sensitivity data. Methods: Using a clinical routine dataset (155 patients, 891 sample… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The relation between CLCR CG_ABW and meropenem CL was consistent with previous studies [8,[47][48][49][50], and the additional impact of body mass on meropenem clearance (CL nonfilt ) was in line with meropenem elimination besides glomerular filtration such as tubular secretion [51]. Importantly, the final pharmacokinetic model did not include simple allometric scaling of total meropenem CL with ABW but rather a fraction of CL (i.e., by the nonfiltered elimination pathway, 47.7% of total CL) was scaled by ABW and the dominant renally filtered elimination pathway by CLCR (see Sect.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The relation between CLCR CG_ABW and meropenem CL was consistent with previous studies [8,[47][48][49][50], and the additional impact of body mass on meropenem clearance (CL nonfilt ) was in line with meropenem elimination besides glomerular filtration such as tubular secretion [51]. Importantly, the final pharmacokinetic model did not include simple allometric scaling of total meropenem CL with ABW but rather a fraction of CL (i.e., by the nonfiltered elimination pathway, 47.7% of total CL) was scaled by ABW and the dominant renally filtered elimination pathway by CLCR (see Sect.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…We postulate that prolonged infusion of meropenem over 3 h or a high-dosage regimen of 6 g/day should be considered, particularly for treating critically ill patients with increased renal clearance and those infected with less susceptible pathogens, to provide appropriate meropenem concentrations to them and those on ECMO support. Real-time therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM)-guided dosing optimization of meropenem using dosing software could further help clinicians to improve clinical outcomes and reduce toxicity in critically ill patients [14][15][16]. Evaluating the influence of TDM of meropenem on clinical outcomes in ECMO patients is warranted, since the use of inappropriate meropenem concentrations is possible, especially when using the standard-dose regimen [17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…sample collection 5 min to late) would lead to massive inaccuracies of the measured concentrations 19 . It should be noted as a strength of this study that the model employed can be considered valid since the model was evaluated externally showing negligible bias 8 . The evaluation of the PK model revealed a negligibly small underestimation of the measured concentrations (− 0.84 mg/L).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…A previously published two compartment model with first-order elimination of critically ill patients was employed for simulation 7 . This model was recently successfully evaluated and revealed a neglectable bias 8 . Briefly, this model is based on a prospective observational study in a population of 48 critically ill patients with severe infections and dense PK sampling (n = 1376) over 4 days.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%