Abstract-We recently showed that sialic acid content of LDL was not a marker of early cardiovascular disease (Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1995;15:334 -339). Here, we investigated this parameter in patients with advanced coronary artery disease (CAD). We first examined 100 patients having undergone coronary angiography. The distribution of LDL sialic acid values was very similar in subjects with no coronary stenosis (31.3Ϯ3.7 nmol/mg LDL protein, meanϮSD) and those with Ն75% stenosis in at least one main coronary artery or Ն50% stenosis in at least two main coronary arteries (32.1Ϯ5.5 nmol/mg LDL protein). In contrast, LDL sialic acid content was significantly increased in patients with both coronary stenosis and peripheral arterial atherosclerotic lesions compared with those with either no lesion or only one or the other type of lesion. We then examined LDL sialic acid content in 20 patients with acute myocardial infarction. LDL sialic acid content was significantly higher (35.9Ϯ3.2 nmol/mg LDL protein) than that in the CAD(Ϫ) control group. These data suggest that LDL sialic acid content increases with the extension of atherosclerosis and its progression to acute complications. To explain the discordance with Orekhov and coworkers (Atherosclerosis. 1991;86:153-161), who showed that LDL sialic acid content in patients with advanced CAD was lower than that in healthy subjects, we studied the time courses of sialic acid, TBARS, and vitamin E levels in LDL dialyzed in different experimental conditions. A continuous decrease in both sialic acid and vitamin E levels and an increase in TBARS levels were observed in LDL samples containing less than 1 mmol/L EDTA, the intensity and rapidity of which varied with the EDTA concentration in the buffer. Our data support the idea that desialylation may result from in vitro peroxidation of LDL. (Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1998;18:876-883.)