2018
DOI: 10.20546/ijcmas.2018.705.283
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Turmeric (Curcuma longa L.) Genotypes for Growth, Yield and Quality Traits under Northern Plains of India

Abstract: The present experiment was conducted in randomized block design with three replications in summer season 2016-17 at the Main Experiment Station of the Department of Vegetable Science, NDUA&T, Kumarganj, Faizabad. Total 22 genotypes were taken for study including two checks. Observations were recorded on various growth, yield and quality traits viz. plant height (cm), number of tillers per clump, number of leaves per shoot, weight of fresh rhizomes per plant (g), weight of mother rhizomes (g), number of primary… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The variation in the yield components could attribute to better growth of aerial/ vegetative parts resulting in increased accumulation of photosynthets in rhizome parts. Similar variations in these characters for all the genotypes were reported by Cholke (1993), Jana and Bhattacharya (2001), Sinkar et al (2005) and Salimath et al (2014), Prasath et al (2016), Mohan et al (2017), Mishra and Singh (2017), Venugopal and Pariari (2017), Maurya et al (2018a) and Naik and Padmasree (2018) and Anal (2019).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The variation in the yield components could attribute to better growth of aerial/ vegetative parts resulting in increased accumulation of photosynthets in rhizome parts. Similar variations in these characters for all the genotypes were reported by Cholke (1993), Jana and Bhattacharya (2001), Sinkar et al (2005) and Salimath et al (2014), Prasath et al (2016), Mohan et al (2017), Mishra and Singh (2017), Venugopal and Pariari (2017), Maurya et al (2018a) and Naik and Padmasree (2018) and Anal (2019).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Plant height of genotype Suroma (101.06 cm) was significantly higher and was statistically at par with six other genotypes viz., Rajendra Sonia (98.56cm), Sugandham (98.40cm), PH-1 (97.63cm), Tanda local (97.41cm), SJT-09 (95.96cm) and Prabha (95.40cm) whereas minimum plant height was recorded in Suguna (88.80cm). Genotypic variation for plant height have been also reported by various workers viz., Maurya et al (2018) [19] ; Mishra and Singh (2017) [20] and Deb and Chakraborty (2017) [9] .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%