2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2020.105694
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of white-box versus black-box machine learning models in estimating ambient black carbon concentration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
47
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
2
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The penetration efficiency was ~47% for 0.01 μm, ~93% for 0.3 μm and ~40% for 10 μm (Hussein et al, 2020). These deficiency of measurement at the upper and lower edges is somewhat in alignment with other literatures.…”
Section: Measurement Sites and Instrumentssupporting
confidence: 79%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The penetration efficiency was ~47% for 0.01 μm, ~93% for 0.3 μm and ~40% for 10 μm (Hussein et al, 2020). These deficiency of measurement at the upper and lower edges is somewhat in alignment with other literatures.…”
Section: Measurement Sites and Instrumentssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…In warmer months, the diurnal cycles are not as distinct, but a sharp peak of nucleation mode around noon is found, which is associated with the occurrence of new particle formation. These events occurred very often in the summer as suggested by Hussein et al (2020). The amplitude of diurnal cycles of coarse mode is small while the patterns of accumulation are not clear ( Figure 6).…”
Section: General Pattern Of Particle Size Distributionmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 3 more Smart Citations