Evaluation Performance of Protocols LEACH, 802.15.4 and CBRP, Using Analysis of QoS in WSNs

Baygi, Syyed Javad Mohammadi; Mokhtari, M.

doi:10.4236/wsn.2014.610022

Cited by 6 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 13 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The result of this research can provide guidance and direction to research and solve problems related to QoS requirements, and help to achieve the required QoS in WSNs. In this article [6], QoS parameters were studied in detail to evaluate the performance of three protocols. To do it, first three protocols 802.15.4, LEACH and CBRP were separately simulated in the NS simulator.…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…These include the assessment between multi-constrained QoS multipath routing in WSNs and the impact of AODV Protocol on the intensity of the network performance. Also, it shows the effect of the AODV protocol which ensures the efficiency [6].…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…As a result performance of proposed method is better than other methods. The delay metric between two nodes represented as is the sum of the processing, queuing, transmission, and propagation delay [6]. The average data delivery delay is the end-to-end delay experienced by successfully received packets [13].…”

Section: Simulation and Analysis Of Parameters Of Service Qualitymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Some quality assessment parameters include: The whole network covering, the optimal number of active nodes in the network, the accuracy of the observation (measurement accuracy of the sensor), the accuracy of the data transfer, data transfer in the shortest possible time, reliability, network lifetime and energy consumption in the networks. [6]. As defined in [7,8], Quality of Service is a set of service requirements to be met by the network while transporting a flow.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Proposed A Heterogeneous Clustering Algorithm to Improve QoS in WSN

Mokhtari¹,

Tavakoli²

2016

IJCNC

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this article it has presented leach extended hierarchical 3-level clustered heterogeneous and dynamics algorithm. On suggested protocol (LEH3LA) with planning of selected auction cluster head, and alternative cluster head node, problem of delay on processing, processing of selecting members, decrease of expenses, and energy consumption, decrease of sending message, and receiving messages inside the clusters, selecting of cluster heads in large sensor networks were solved. This algorithm uses hierarchical heterogeneous network (3-levels), collective intelligence, and intra-cluster interaction for communications. Also it will solve the problems of sending data in Multi-BS mobile networks, expanding inter-cluster networks, overlap cluster, genesis orphan nodes, boundary change dynamically clusters, using backbone networks, cloud sensor. Using sleep/wake scheduling algorithm or TDMA-schedule alternative cluster head node provides redundancy, and fault tolerance. Local processing in cluster head nodes, and alternative cluster head, intra-cluster and inter-cluster communications such as Multi-HOP cause increase on processing speed, and sending data intra-cluster and inter-cluster. Decrease of overhead network, and increase the load balancing among cluster heads. Using encapsulation of data method, by cluster head nodes, energy consumption decrease during sending data. Also by improving quality of service (QoS) in CBRP, LEACH, 802.15.4, decrease of energy consumption in sensors, cluster heads and alternative cluster head nodes, cause increase on lift time of sensor networks.

show abstract

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Simulation and Analysis Of Parameters Of Service Qualitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Proposed A Heterogeneous Clustering Algorithm to Improve QoS in WSN

Mokhtari¹,

Tavakoli²

2016

IJCNC

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Improving performance in mobile ad hoc networks by reliable path selection routing using RPS‐LEACH

Anbarasan¹,

Prakash²,

Anand³

et al. 2018

Concurrency and Computation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Summary Vitality reliant and mobility are the two factors that deplete some measure of energy during the radio communication often occur in Mobile Ad hoc Network (MANET) among and between the nodes. Since MANET is a decentralized system, it poses to the exploitation of energy during the reliable path selection during routing. Hence, selection of protocol plays a major aspect in MANET for combatting against the energy depletion of nodes, Instable link, mobility character, and load balancing. The RPS‐LEACH protocol is proposed in this paper for the efficient path selection by organizing the nodes into clusters. For each cluster, Cluster Head (CH) is elected based on its strong transmission power and battery life. The Cluster Members (CM) is organized, respectively, based on its ability to respond to its cluster head REQs. Mainly, RPS values are calculated by the two parameters such as (i) successful interactions and (ii) unsuccessful interactions. In the proposed system, RPS (Reliable Path Selection) values are exchanged among the nodes for the reliable path selection by choosing the highest RPS value node for its communication. Hence, by adopting the RPS scheme, the nodes are able to choose the most reliable path for the efficient data transfer by exchanging the RPS values by ignoring the paths that consuming long time to transfer the data. In this procedure, correspondence convention, which comprises imperative impact of vitality liberality of such networks, is addressed. In cases of applications with no predefined or intended infrastructure, this scheme paves way for the versatile hubs to perform as the energy efficient routing nodes. Simulation carried out in NS2 and results shown improved performance when compared with LDTS and RPS‐LEACH.

show abstract