2018
DOI: 10.1103/physreve.98.052804
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaporation kinetics of pure water drops: Thermal patterns, Marangoni flow, and interfacial temperature difference

Abstract: We report a systematic study on the role of Marangoni convection on the evaporation kinetics of pure water drops, considering the influence of heating regime and surface wettability. The Marangoni flows were induced via heating under constant wall temperature (uniform heating) and constant heat flux (local heating) regimes below the drops. To visualize the thermal patterns/flows emerging within the water drops we employed infrared (IR) thermography and we captured the evolution of the drop profile with a CCD c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
40
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sobac and Brutin [8] investigated the influence of substrate properties on the evaporation process in both hydrophilic and hydrophobic cases. Results highlight the need for more accurate models to account for the buoyant convection in vapor transport as well as the evaporative cooling and heat conduction between the droplet and the substrate [9]. Similar experiments were conducted by Talbot et al [10] on picoliter droplets, which suggest that the thermal effects on the evaporation rate are much stronger for droplets on low-thermal-conductivity substrates than those on high-thermal-conductivity substrates.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Sobac and Brutin [8] investigated the influence of substrate properties on the evaporation process in both hydrophilic and hydrophobic cases. Results highlight the need for more accurate models to account for the buoyant convection in vapor transport as well as the evaporative cooling and heat conduction between the droplet and the substrate [9]. Similar experiments were conducted by Talbot et al [10] on picoliter droplets, which suggest that the thermal effects on the evaporation rate are much stronger for droplets on low-thermal-conductivity substrates than those on high-thermal-conductivity substrates.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…To verify if cloaking affected droplet evaporation mass transfer, we conducted experiments using the traditional transient‐based evaporation technique on the same samples. [ 27 ] We deposited water droplets of identical size and allowed them to evaporate completely, measuring the droplet radius as a function of time. Furthermore, we measured the total time for complete droplet evaporation ( t e ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the particles inside the drop exhibit motility upon UV illumination; therefore, the differences cannot be attributed to a lack of chemical activity, but they correlate with the predicted absence of the Marangoni flow response from the interface. Furthermore, it is known that for a water drop in air the evaporation of water may give rise to Marangoni stress and flow within the drop 36 . Thus the absence of the collective motion in this latter experiment implies that the activity-induced nature of these stresses is essential for the emergence of the phenomenology of the collective effects reported here.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%