1976
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.14.1561
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence for nonstatistical population of configurations in Li-like neon followingCl13+→ Ne collisions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1979
1979
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…7) support this conclusion. In contrast to this finding Matthews et al [20] reported results from a single collision 45 MeV C113+ on Ne gas experiment, where they observe a strong overpopulation of Li-like Is 2s 2-and ls 2s 2p-states relative to the Is 2p2-configurations. Similar conclusions can be drawn from 56 MeV Ar or 200 MeV Xe on Ne [21,22] data.…”
Section: Klm- Kln- and Hypersatellite-transitionsmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…7) support this conclusion. In contrast to this finding Matthews et al [20] reported results from a single collision 45 MeV C113+ on Ne gas experiment, where they observe a strong overpopulation of Li-like Is 2s 2-and ls 2s 2p-states relative to the Is 2p2-configurations. Similar conclusions can be drawn from 56 MeV Ar or 200 MeV Xe on Ne [21,22] data.…”
Section: Klm- Kln- and Hypersatellite-transitionsmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…If these measurements were made with a similar technique, we derived a mean value that is given in Table 3. However, the results presented by Matthews et al [70] were obtained with two very different techniques, X-ray emission and Auger electron spectroscopy. We treat these results as independent measurements.…”
Section: Comparison Of Absolute Energy Measurements With Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The published 1s( 2 S)2s2p( 1 P • ) 2 P • term value at 672.70( 4) eV (7354138(868) cm −1 ) does not fit the positions of levels predicted by Yerokhin et al [5] at 7371805(49) cm −1 and 7372047(45) cm −1 , for J = 1/2 and 3/2 respectively (levels 1o3 and 3o3 in Table A), and is far from other experiments. For the 1s( 2 S)2s2p( 1 P • ) 2 P • term, Wargelin et al [103], Stolterfoht et al [94], Matthews et al [70] and Pospieszczyk [80] gave values 7374100(1600) cm −1 , 7364600(5600) cm −1 , 7369000(12000) cm −1 , 7369000(11000) cm −1 , respectively. Therefore, we have discarded the value of Kádár et al [56] for this term as incorrectly identified.…”
Section: Collection and Evaluation Of Experimental Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(ls 2p3)SS°-(lsZ 2pZ)aP ~ and (1 s 2s 2p 2) 5pc_ (1 s 2 2s 2p) ap0 transitions at 920.7eV, 914.0eV [11], 895.3eV, 894.3eV [12], 881.0eV and 879.6eV [13] respectively. For increased resolution the crystal and the detector could be moved farther away from the target chamber.…”
Section: Plane Crystal X-ray Spectrometermentioning
confidence: 99%