2014
DOI: 10.1213/ane.0000000000000234
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence for the Use of Preoperative Risk Assessment Scores in Elective Cranial Neurosurgery

Abstract: Large prospective studies are needed to validate the use of the reviewed risk scores in elective cranial neurosurgery. It appears, however, that the patient's preoperative physical and functional status can be used to predict the short- and long-term outcome in elective cranial neurosurgery.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
33
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
3
33
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The Karnofsky Performance Score (KPS), another measure preoperatively assessed in our study cohort. Even though our systematic review found support for the use of KPS in the preoperative risk stratification of patients with intracranial tumors, it remains unclear whether KPS can reliably predict mortality and morbidity in other patient groups 11.…”
mentioning
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The Karnofsky Performance Score (KPS), another measure preoperatively assessed in our study cohort. Even though our systematic review found support for the use of KPS in the preoperative risk stratification of patients with intracranial tumors, it remains unclear whether KPS can reliably predict mortality and morbidity in other patient groups 11.…”
mentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Limitations of and reasoning behind the used scales have been thoroughly discussed previously. 11 Finally, there is no universal consensus over categorizing complications in neurosurgical patients. Thus, the inclusion of silent strokes and reoperations in major morbidity may be criticized.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In our cohort, there was a statistically significant difference in postoperative performance status for patients presenting a preoperative ASA score of I/II versus III. This score was found to be associated with functional outcome in intracranial meningiomas, unruptured aneurysms, and gliomas, [25][26][27] as well as a predictor of surgical site infections and postoperative meningitis. 28,29 To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of an association between ASA scores and postoperative performance status (KPS and mRS) in PMC/CST surgery.…”
Section: Preoperative Performance Status and Asa Scorementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there is no single risk score that can be consistently applied to discriminate between low-risk and high-risk neurosurgical patients. 12 A recent review compared the utility of several neurosurgical and nonspecific risk scores in patients undergoing elective cranial neurosurgery. They assessed the ability of multiple scales to predict both the occurrence of neurosurgical complications, nonspecific surgical complications, and overall morbidity and mortality in patients.…”
Section: Neurosurgical Risk Assessment Scoresmentioning
confidence: 99%