1995
DOI: 10.1086/175120
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolution of magnetized protoplanetary disks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
27
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This has been carried out in many papers (see e.g. Ruden & Lin 1986;Ruden & Pollack 1991;Reyes-Ruiz & Stepinski 1995, to cite only a few), but the detailed expressions may differ slightly from one work to another. Generally, these works have considered disks of small masses and sizes, and have neglected the gravitational potential of the disks themselves.…”
Section: Calculating Disk Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has been carried out in many papers (see e.g. Ruden & Lin 1986;Ruden & Pollack 1991;Reyes-Ruiz & Stepinski 1995, to cite only a few), but the detailed expressions may differ slightly from one work to another. Generally, these works have considered disks of small masses and sizes, and have neglected the gravitational potential of the disks themselves.…”
Section: Calculating Disk Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper we consider the evolution of the layered disc, which cannot be in a steady state (Gammie 1996, 1999; Stepinski 1999), and examine the implications for the outflow history of young stars and for the predicted disc mass. The most significant changes to the disc structure occur at the radii of greatest interest for planet formation (Reyes‐Ruiz & Stepinski 1995), and we discuss the implications for the migration of low‐mass planets, and for the eccentricity of massive planets interacting with the disc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the differential rotation of the disc can allow for large scale magnetic fields, possibly with spatiotemporal order (similar to the solar 11 year cycle; see, e.g., Parker 1979). Such a dynamo may have operated in the solar nebula and in circumstellar or protoplanetary discs (e.g., Reyes-Ruiz & Stepinski 1995). However, not much is known about the mutual interaction between a stellar magnetic field and a dynamo-generated disc field.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%