1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0039-6028(98)00658-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolution of surface morphology of vicinal Si(111) surfaces after aluminum deposition

Abstract: We have studied changes in surface morphology of vicinal Si(111) surfaces with a miscut of 1.3°in the [2 :11] direction after Al deposition at elevated temperatures. The clean surface phase separates into a (111)-oriented phase and a stepped phase. Submonolayer Al deposition at 650°C, the normal preparation temperature of the Al/Si(111)-(ǰ3×ǰ3)R30°structure, only induces minor changes in the surface morphology. However, after Al deposition at temperatures above the order-disorder phase transition temperature, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
2
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
2
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The present value is in reasonable agreement with the adatom charge obtained by first-principles calculation ͑without the wind force͒, 0.05͉e͉. 9 If we use an experimental A value of 0.01-0.04 eV nm at 900°C, 26 z eff Ϸ0.02͉e͉ -0.06͉e͉. These values may be slightly larger than the charge estimated from the decay of step bunches by Fu et al.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The present value is in reasonable agreement with the adatom charge obtained by first-principles calculation ͑without the wind force͒, 0.05͉e͉. 9 If we use an experimental A value of 0.01-0.04 eV nm at 900°C, 26 z eff Ϸ0.02͉e͉ -0.06͉e͉. These values may be slightly larger than the charge estimated from the decay of step bunches by Fu et al.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Making use of a more accurate expansion 29 for à , we calculate A = 0.46Ϯ 0.02 eV Å which agrees with the value A = 0.4Ϯ 0.1 eV Å measured by Williams et al 32 Remarkably, A of the clean surface is between about two and three times smaller than that of a surface covered with 0.25 Å of Al, where A is measured to be 1.2 eV Å. 33 The present result confirms the previous finding that the step interaction energy is highly sensitive to submonolayer coverage of metals and provides a firm starting ground for the investigation of the vicinal Si͑001͒ surfaces that we present in Sec. IV B.…”
Section: A Flat Si(111)-7 ã 7 Surfacesupporting
confidence: 87%
“…There are many experimental and theoretical studies (mostly band structure calculations) on the adsorption of group IIIA, i.e., B, Al, Ga, ,, and In ,,,, on Si(111) surface, concerning the geometric and electronic structure, the surface changes associated with metal diffusion on the surface, the growth of group IIIA films on Si(111), and the properties induced by the adsorption of M on the Si(111) surface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many experimental and theoretical studies (mostly band structure calculations) on the adsorption of group IIIA, i.e., B, [2][3][4][5][6][7] Al, [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22] Ga, 14,15,[22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32] and In [13][14][15]17,21,23,[33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44] on Si(111) surface, concerning the geometric and electronic structure, the surface changes associated with metal diffusion on the surface, the growth of group IIIA films on Si(111), and the properties induced by the adsorption of M on the Si...…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%