2018
DOI: 10.1101/280826
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolution of the mutational process under relaxed selection inCaenorhabditis elegans

Abstract: The mutational process varies at many levels, from within genomes to among taxa. Many mechanisms have been linked to variation in mutation, but understanding of the evolution of the mutational process is rudimentary. Physiological condition is often implicated as a source of variation in microbial mutation rate and may contribute to mutation rate variation in multicellular organisms.Deleterious mutations are a ubiquitous source of variation in condition. We test the hypothesis that the mutational process depen… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
22
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
3
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…But a bias towards insertions relative to deletions has been observed for some eukaryotes (DENVER et al 2004;LYNCH et al 2008;SUNG et al 2012a;SUNG et al 2012b;FARLOW et al 2015; BEHRINGER AND HALL 2016a). Our results indicate that deletion events outnumber insertions in D. discoideum, consistent with a recent study in C. elegans (SAXENA et al 2019).…”
Section: Insertion/deletion Biassupporting
confidence: 93%
“…But a bias towards insertions relative to deletions has been observed for some eukaryotes (DENVER et al 2004;LYNCH et al 2008;SUNG et al 2012a;SUNG et al 2012b;FARLOW et al 2015; BEHRINGER AND HALL 2016a). Our results indicate that deletion events outnumber insertions in D. discoideum, consistent with a recent study in C. elegans (SAXENA et al 2019).…”
Section: Insertion/deletion Biassupporting
confidence: 93%
“…We therefore directly inquired whether this deletion (and the other mutations) occurred recurrently at a detectable frequency by analyzing sequence data of other MA lines (Saxena et al 2019: 75 other MA lines, 3469 nuclear mutations). We did not find any other mutation at the corresponding positions and the closest mutations were at least 4 kb away (Supplementary File 7).…”
Section: Molecular Nature Of the Causal Mutations And Mutation Rates mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These simulations consider a fixed number (100) of freely recombining loci while controlling the probability that each loci is mutated at each generation (x-axis; equivalent to changing the mutational target size). In C.elegans , given a per-site SNP mutation rate on the order of 10 − 9 (Saxena et al (2018)), a mutation rate of 10 − 4 -10 − 3 would correspond to a total target size of between 1Mb and 10Mb (for reference, the average gene length is around 5Kb). Even when considering such large loci, the number of mutations reaching 5% frequency in the population is small.…”
Section: Supplementary Figuresmentioning
confidence: 99%