2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.08.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolution of the nanostructure of Pt and Pt–Co polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell electrocatalysts at successive degradation stages probed by X-ray photoemission

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ZFO-C electrodes under consideration were prepared using carbon coated ZnFe 2 O 4 particles, with the structural properties described in the Supporting Information, following the procedures described in previous works , and briefly described in the Supporting Information. Electrodes at selected lithiation levels were prepared, stored under controlled conditions, and inserted into the sample chambers for X-ray measurements (see for example refs and for XAS and XPS, respectively). The electrochemical performance of the electrodes was measured by galvanostatic intermittent titration technique (GITT), as shown in Figure a, and the results are in line with previous findings. , GITT measurements were performed, as a series of galvanostatic steps (10 min each) at a current rate C/20, corresponding to 50 mAg –1 , followed by open-circuit relaxation periods of 60 min.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The ZFO-C electrodes under consideration were prepared using carbon coated ZnFe 2 O 4 particles, with the structural properties described in the Supporting Information, following the procedures described in previous works , and briefly described in the Supporting Information. Electrodes at selected lithiation levels were prepared, stored under controlled conditions, and inserted into the sample chambers for X-ray measurements (see for example refs and for XAS and XPS, respectively). The electrochemical performance of the electrodes was measured by galvanostatic intermittent titration technique (GITT), as shown in Figure a, and the results are in line with previous findings. , GITT measurements were performed, as a series of galvanostatic steps (10 min each) at a current rate C/20, corresponding to 50 mAg –1 , followed by open-circuit relaxation periods of 60 min.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The surface and chemical sensitivity of X-ray photoemission spectroscopy (XPS) was used to get a deeper insight on the evolution of the uppermost SEI layers, i.e., in direct contact with the electrolytic salt. The C 1s XPS spectra reported in Figure have been collected using a laboratory source (Al Kα, photon energy h ν = 1486.6 eV) and an hemispherical analyzer (see for example ref and references therein). The kinetic energy of the collected photoelectrons ( E kin ∼ 1200 eV) corresponds to a typical electron mean free path of ∼2 nm and to maximum EPDs of about 5 nm.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, Pt 3 Co/C showed decreases in the rate constants of the redox reactions for the voltage cycling as the number of ADT cycles increased. Although the Pt-skin structure with Pt–Co alloy core is reported to enhance electrochemical activity and stability, the addition of Co cannot perfectly suppress the deactivation of the cathode electrocatalyst. The time-resolved XAFS study suggested that ADT brought about not only decreases in the number of the active sites on Pt 3 Co/C but also changes in the reactivity on each active site on the electrocatalyst. The study showed a different mechanism of the degradation processes of the Pt/C and Pt 3 Co/C cathode electrocatalysts for ADT, suggesting the intrinsic deactivation of Pt 3 Co/C cathode electrocatalyst under identical conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These observations confirm the Co nanofilms-induced modification of electronic properties or geometric structure of Pd nanoparticles. The Co 2p 3/2 XPS peaks in Figures 3D,E show that Co states of the exposed Co atoms consist of Co metal (Co 0 ) and Co oxides (Co 2+ ) (Ali et al, 2014 ; Yun et al, 2015 ). After the two shakeup satellite peaks associated with the Co (2p) line of Co 2+ are taken into account (Xiao et al, 2015 ), the major Co 2p 3/2 XPS peaks with the typical binding energy around 782 eV correspond to Co 2+ oxides.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%