1996
DOI: 10.2307/2171851
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolution with State-Dependent Mutations

Abstract: JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
163
0
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 203 publications
(166 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
163
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the analysis in those papers is devoted to issues in cooperative game theory such as the characterization of value allocations (see also, Myerson [32]). 5 5 See Dutta and Jackson [9] for an overview of the network formation literature.…”
Section: The Closely Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the analysis in those papers is devoted to issues in cooperative game theory such as the characterization of value allocations (see also, Myerson [32]). 5 5 See Dutta and Jackson [9] for an overview of the network formation literature.…”
Section: The Closely Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 Thus 9 The probability of a mutation is the same for any link. See Bergin and Lipman [5] for a discussion of the role of such an assumption. mutations or trembles operate on link creation and destruction.…”
Section: A Stochastic Dynamic Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the early criticisms on the literature, due to Bergin and Lipman (1996), was that results might change if the perturbations (mistakes or mutations) which are used to define stochastic stability can be defined in a state-dependent way. By specifying arbitrary asymmetric perturbations it is possible to stabilize any outcome.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evolutionary game theory demonstrates that the exact nature of such individual-level deviations can crucially influence equilibrium selection (Kandori et al, 1993;Young, 1993Young, , 1998Young, , 2011aKandori and Rob, 1995;Blume, 2003;Montaneri and Saberi, 2010;Sandholm, 2010;Newton, 2012a;Bergin and Lipman, 1996). In this paper, we therefore tested competing assumptions regarding the nature of deviations, analyzing data from a laboratory experiment on coordination games played in fixed networks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%