2005
DOI: 10.1590/s0001-37652005000400006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolutionary change - patterns and processes

Abstract: The present review considered: (a) the factors that conditioned the early transition from non-life to life; (b) genome structure and complexity in prokaryotes, eukaryotes, and organelles; (c) comparative human chromosome genomics; and (d) the Brazilian contribution to some of these studies. Understanding the dialectical conflict between freedom and organization is fundamental to give meaning to the patterns and processes of organic evolution.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 124 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Different microevolutive forces such as selection, genetic drift, and eventually recombination, conversion and hitchhiking are probably present (Maynard Smith and Haigh, 1974). Moreover, the evolutionary processes act on genetic regions and genes, being selection (positive or negative) the most important, followed by others as mutations (Salzano, 2005). Besides, genetic flow is related to different migrations in the history of the involved populations that generated differences in populations and subpopulations (Stumpf and Goldstein, 2003;Choudhry et al, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different microevolutive forces such as selection, genetic drift, and eventually recombination, conversion and hitchhiking are probably present (Maynard Smith and Haigh, 1974). Moreover, the evolutionary processes act on genetic regions and genes, being selection (positive or negative) the most important, followed by others as mutations (Salzano, 2005). Besides, genetic flow is related to different migrations in the history of the involved populations that generated differences in populations and subpopulations (Stumpf and Goldstein, 2003;Choudhry et al, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%