2017
DOI: 10.1104/pp.16.01848
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolutionary Conservation of ABA Signaling for Stomatal Closure

Abstract: Abscisic acid (ABA)-driven stomatal regulation reportedly evolved after the divergence of ferns, during the early evolution of seed plants approximately 360 million years ago. This hypothesis is based on the observation that the stomata of certain fern species are unresponsive to ABA, but exhibit passive hydraulic control. However, ABA-induced stomatal closure was detected in some mosses and lycophytes. Here, we observed that a number of ABA signaling and membrane transporter protein families diversified over … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

7
167
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 178 publications
(179 citation statements)
references
References 96 publications
(139 reference statements)
7
167
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When combined with the fact that unlike angiosperms, fern and lycophyte stomata do not respond to endogenous levels of ABA (McAdam and Brodribb, 2012), the conclusion that ABA-mediated closure is not important in basal vascular plants seems robust. However, reports regularly emerge of small stomatal responses in fern and lycophyte guard cells artificially exposed to ABA levels hundreds of thousands to millions of times higher than endogenous levels (Ruszala et al, 2011;Cai et al, 2017;Hõrak et al 2017). The reasonable conclusion from these data is that fern and lycophyte guard cells react to exceedingly high levels of ABA, but the challenge remains to understand the adaptive relevance of such observations.…”
Section: Why Is Stomatal Evolution Important?mentioning
confidence: 86%
“…When combined with the fact that unlike angiosperms, fern and lycophyte stomata do not respond to endogenous levels of ABA (McAdam and Brodribb, 2012), the conclusion that ABA-mediated closure is not important in basal vascular plants seems robust. However, reports regularly emerge of small stomatal responses in fern and lycophyte guard cells artificially exposed to ABA levels hundreds of thousands to millions of times higher than endogenous levels (Ruszala et al, 2011;Cai et al, 2017;Hõrak et al 2017). The reasonable conclusion from these data is that fern and lycophyte guard cells react to exceedingly high levels of ABA, but the challenge remains to understand the adaptive relevance of such observations.…”
Section: Why Is Stomatal Evolution Important?mentioning
confidence: 86%
“…1C; Brodribb and McAdam, 2011;Cai et al, 2017), suggesting that the ABA responsiveness may have been lost in some lineages of ferns. In addition to the direct effect on stomata, ABA reduces leaf hydraulic conductance in angiosperms (Shatil-Cohen et al, 2011;Pantin et al, 2013a).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This indicates that, while several ferns are capable of ABA perception and response, the kinetics and underlying molecular mechanisms of this response could be different in ferns and in angiosperms. The components of the core stomatal ABA signaling pathway have been shown to be present in mosses, lycophytes, ferns, and angiosperms (Hanada et al, 2011;Cai et al, 2017), indicating an early origin of ABA signal transduction. Nevertheless, it is possible that not all of these proteins have strictly stomata-related functions in ferns, as was shown recently for a homolog of the OST1 kinase that participates in sex determination in a fern (McAdam et al, 2016).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations