1991
DOI: 10.1086/285210
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolutionary Implications of Fruit-Processing Limitations in Cedar Waxwings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
89
4
2

Year Published

1996
1996
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 109 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
1
89
4
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Fruits are generally considered to be a food resource high in bulk (Herrera 1987), and bulk overloads the gut thereby reducing ingestion rate. Rapid seed processing may clear the gut and thus allow an increased ingestion rate (Levey & Grajal 1991;Levey 1992). Waxwings fed two types of artificial fruit (agar-based sugar solution as pulp and plastic beads as seeds) with equal seed loads but with different seed sizes consumed significantly more of the larger-seeded fruits.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Fruits are generally considered to be a food resource high in bulk (Herrera 1987), and bulk overloads the gut thereby reducing ingestion rate. Rapid seed processing may clear the gut and thus allow an increased ingestion rate (Levey & Grajal 1991;Levey 1992). Waxwings fed two types of artificial fruit (agar-based sugar solution as pulp and plastic beads as seeds) with equal seed loads but with different seed sizes consumed significantly more of the larger-seeded fruits.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Waxwings fed two types of artificial fruit (agar-based sugar solution as pulp and plastic beads as seeds) with equal seed loads but with different seed sizes consumed significantly more of the larger-seeded fruits. Because large seeds were defecated more quickly than small seeds, the increase in fruit consumption indicated that waxwings were process rate limited (Levey & Grajal 1991). Levey (1992) reported that freely feeding manakins took natural and artificial fruits very quickly after regurgitation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…SI ranges between 0 and 1; with low values indicating a high frequency of pecking and high values suggesting a high frequency of swallowing. This index suffers a possible shortcoming as some bird species usually regurgitate large seeds (Herrera 1984a;Sorensen 1984;Johnson et al 1985;Levey 1986;Worthington 1989;Levey & Grajal 1991). Birds species that regurgitate will show a smaller SI than species that do not.…”
Section: Frequency Of Fruit Sizes and Pecking Behaviour In The Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This feeding behaviour provides additional advantages for birds as they do not carry the ballast of the seed and most of their gut volume can be used for processing digestible material (Sorensen 1984;Levey 1986Levey , 1987Worthington 1989;Levey & Grajal 1991).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%