2002
DOI: 10.2307/3315951
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exact and approximate sum representations for the Dirichlet process

Abstract: The Dirichlet process can be regarded as a random probability measure for which the authors examine various sum representations. They consider in particular the gamma process construction of Ferguson (1973) and the “stick‐breaking” construction of Sethuraman (1994). They propose a Dirichlet finite sum representation that strongly approximates the Dirichlet process. They assess the accuracy of this approximation and characterize the posterior that this new prior leads to in the context of Bayesian nonpara‐metri… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
143
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 207 publications
(147 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
3
143
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, a Pólya urn structure was considered in the collapsed cluster sampling method and the "no-gaps" algorithm for nonconjugate DPM models, proposed respectively by MacEachern (1994) and MacEachern and Müller (1998). On the other hand, Sethuraman and Tiwari (1982) and Sethuraman (1994) proposed an alternative characterization of Dirichlet process mixtures in terms of a "stick-breaking" construction, which was furthermore extended by Ishwaran and Zarepour (2002) and James (2001, 2003) and, more recently, by Walker (2007) and Papaspiliopoulos and Roberts (2008). Using this stick-breaking representation, the distribution of the auxiliary variable, ξ t , introduced above, can be described hierarchically as ,…”
Section: Bayesian Inference For the Garch-dpm Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Also, a Pólya urn structure was considered in the collapsed cluster sampling method and the "no-gaps" algorithm for nonconjugate DPM models, proposed respectively by MacEachern (1994) and MacEachern and Müller (1998). On the other hand, Sethuraman and Tiwari (1982) and Sethuraman (1994) proposed an alternative characterization of Dirichlet process mixtures in terms of a "stick-breaking" construction, which was furthermore extended by Ishwaran and Zarepour (2002) and James (2001, 2003) and, more recently, by Walker (2007) and Papaspiliopoulos and Roberts (2008). Using this stick-breaking representation, the distribution of the auxiliary variable, ξ t , introduced above, can be described hierarchically as ,…”
Section: Bayesian Inference For the Garch-dpm Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(6) is unknown, and is modeled by a Dirichlet process (DP) prior, as will be described in Section 4, resulting in a DP mixture (DPM) model. Although new to the GARCH literature, DPM models have an extensive literature in Bayesian analysis and provide a broad and flexible class of distributions in many different settings, see, for instance, Ishwaran and Zarepour (2002), Basu and Chib (2003) and Ghosh, Basu and Tiwari (2009) and the references therein. In what follows, the model defined in Eqs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be shown that the following finite, hierarchical mixture model converges in distribution to the HDP as L → ∞ (Ishwaran and Zarepour [2002], Teh et al [2006]):…”
Section: Background: Dirichlet Processes and The Sticky Hdp-hmmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The parameters θ i 's are usually chosen as in the Sethuraman's representation, that is i.i.d. G. Iswaran and Zarepour (2002a) studied convergence properties of these random measures. For the choice α j,k = M/k, the limiting measure is Dir(M, G).…”
Section: Priors Obtained From Random Series Representationmentioning
confidence: 99%