2012
DOI: 10.1007/s00426-012-0438-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Examining auditory kappa effects through manipulating intensity differences between sequential tones

Abstract: The auditory kappa effect is a tendency to base the perceived duration of an inter-onset interval (IOI) separating two sequentially presented sounds on the degree of relative pitch distance separating them. Previous research has found that the degree of frequency discrepancy between tones extends the subjective duration of the IOI. In Experiment 1, auditory kappa effects for sound intensity were tested using a three-tone, AXB paradigm (where the intensity of tone X was shifted to be closer to either Tone A or … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We hypothesized that, because time, space and magnitude rely on common mechanisms, a discrepancy in numerical magnitude should directly impact perceived duration; this hypothesis was confirmed. Additionally, the directionality of the sequence (increasing vs. decreasing) did not modulate the effect, replicating previous kappa effect studies (Alards-Tomalin et al, 2013;Henry & McAuley, 2009). This provides convergent support for our view that the present results represent a variant of the kappa effect based on a manipulation of a phenomenological, distance (i.e., the space delineated on a mental number/magnitude line).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…We hypothesized that, because time, space and magnitude rely on common mechanisms, a discrepancy in numerical magnitude should directly impact perceived duration; this hypothesis was confirmed. Additionally, the directionality of the sequence (increasing vs. decreasing) did not modulate the effect, replicating previous kappa effect studies (Alards-Tomalin et al, 2013;Henry & McAuley, 2009). This provides convergent support for our view that the present results represent a variant of the kappa effect based on a manipulation of a phenomenological, distance (i.e., the space delineated on a mental number/magnitude line).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The kappa effect is explained by the imputed velocity model, positing the constancy of motional speed or velocity (Alards-Tomalin et al, 2013;Henry and McAuley, 2009;Jones and Huang, 1982;Sarrazin et al, 2004;ten Hoopen et al, 2008). According to this model, the kappa effect (three stimuli) pattern is perceived as consisting of a single object appearing three times, instead of three discrete objects appearing successively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notably, perceived time is not necessarily a precise reflection of physical features (veridical percepts), but can be influenced by contextual factors such as visual space (Jones and Huang, 1982), sound intensity (Alards-Tomalin et al, 2013), or pitch (Shigeno, 1986;Boltz, 1998Boltz, , 2011Henry and McAuley, 2009). In particular, the pitch trajectory of a stimulus has been shown to distort perceived stimulus timing (Shigeno, 1986;McAuley, 2009, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%