2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2017.05.041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Examining common information technology addictions and their relationships with non-technology-related addictions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
36
2
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
36
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present study, we analyzed the direct association between smartphone addiction assessed by the SPAI and Internet addiction assessed by the CIAS-R. As the items of the SPAI are derived from those of the CIAS-R, the resemblance of item wording between these two instruments may inflate the strength of their association. For instance, the effect size of the present finding ( r = 0.75) is considerably higher than those of previous studies ( r ’s ranged from 0.21 to 0.51) using instruments of smartphone addiction and Internet addiction that are structurally distinct (e.g., Mok et al, 2014 ; Choi et al, 2015 ; Sigerson et al, 2017 ). Nevertheless, this potentially inflated strength of association has also been obtained in past research using structurally similar instruments for assessing smartphone addiction and Internet addiction.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the present study, we analyzed the direct association between smartphone addiction assessed by the SPAI and Internet addiction assessed by the CIAS-R. As the items of the SPAI are derived from those of the CIAS-R, the resemblance of item wording between these two instruments may inflate the strength of their association. For instance, the effect size of the present finding ( r = 0.75) is considerably higher than those of previous studies ( r ’s ranged from 0.21 to 0.51) using instruments of smartphone addiction and Internet addiction that are structurally distinct (e.g., Mok et al, 2014 ; Choi et al, 2015 ; Sigerson et al, 2017 ). Nevertheless, this potentially inflated strength of association has also been obtained in past research using structurally similar instruments for assessing smartphone addiction and Internet addiction.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 93%
“…The present analysis also demonstrates the convergent validity of SPAI-I by revealing its strong positive association with Internet addiction. Although the strength of this association does not exceed the suggested criteria for conceptual overlap between the two constructs ( Kline, 2005 ), the association obtained in our study is stronger than those derived from previous studies using other measures to examine the association between smartphone addiction and Internet addiction ( Choi et al, 2015 ; Pavia et al, 2016 ; Sigerson et al, 2017 ). This discrepancy with previous findings may occur as the SPAI is developed based on a validated measure of Internet addiction (i.e., the CIAS-R), and thus the items of these instruments may have similar wordings.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Individuals cannot be far from technology, owing to the need for faster access to various types of information, interactions, and faster communication (Au-Yong-Oliveiraa, Gonçalvesb, Martinsb, & Branco, 2018). However, there are consequences associated with this rapid development in technology, such as excessive usage (Davis, 2001;Sigerson, Angel, Cheung, & Cheng, 2017), high levels of involvement (Charlton & Danforth, 2007), and addiction (Turel, Serenko, & Giles, 2011). The technology in the field of communication led to the development of a smartphone (David, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, there are many studies, particularly from a neuroscientific perspective, which find parallels among substance-use disorders and IGD (and also other types of Internet-use disorders) and thus justify the classification as an addiction (Weinstein et al, 2017 ). On a behavioral level using questionnaires, some studies, however, show that different types of behavioral addictions (i.e., gambling disorder and different types of Internet addiction) have larger overlap among them compared with the overlap among behavioral addictions and substance-use disorders (Sigerson et al, 2017 ), speaking for a distinct category of behavioral addictions. One has to notice, that there are also significant differences across different types of substance-use disorders (Shmulewitz et al, 2015 ), and they are nevertheless classified together within one category in the DSM-5.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%