2022
DOI: 10.1111/acer.14794
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Examining features of transdermal alcohol biosensor readings: A promising approach with implications for research and intervention

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically, self‐reports of alcohol consumption can be impacted by self‐presentational concerns and alcohol‐related cognitive disruptions (Cherpitel et al, 2018; Ernhart et al, 1988; White, 2003), improperly used breathalyzers can produce readings biased by mouth alcohol (Caddy et al, 1978; Gullberg, 1992), and blood draws are impractical for use in the field. In light of their ability to objectively and unobtrusively assess consumption patterns in naturalistic environments, transdermal sensors have the potential to help users gain insight into their drinking patterns and by extension minimize alcohol‐related morbidity and mortality (Fairbairn & Kang, 2021; Fridberg et al, 2022; Luczak et al, 2018; Piasecki, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Specifically, self‐reports of alcohol consumption can be impacted by self‐presentational concerns and alcohol‐related cognitive disruptions (Cherpitel et al, 2018; Ernhart et al, 1988; White, 2003), improperly used breathalyzers can produce readings biased by mouth alcohol (Caddy et al, 1978; Gullberg, 1992), and blood draws are impractical for use in the field. In light of their ability to objectively and unobtrusively assess consumption patterns in naturalistic environments, transdermal sensors have the potential to help users gain insight into their drinking patterns and by extension minimize alcohol‐related morbidity and mortality (Fairbairn & Kang, 2021; Fridberg et al, 2022; Luczak et al, 2018; Piasecki, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In light of their ability to objectively and unobtrusively assess consumption patterns in naturalistic environments, transdermal sensors have the potential to help users gain insight into their drinking patterns and by extension minimize alcohol-related morbidity and mortality (Fairbairn & Kang, 2021;Fridberg et al, 2022;Luczak et al, 2018;Piasecki, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The science of wearable transdermal sensors continues to advance, offering sleeker and less intrusive sensors providing drinking detection and tracking in near real time (Ash et al, 2022;Fairbairn & Bosch, 2021;Fridberg et al, 2022;Wang et al, 2019Wang et al, , 2021. As a result, research professionals and consumers alike are likely to increase the adoption of wearable TAC sensor technology, creating an urgent need to establish the potential of TAC data as a means of documenting risk and protective processes in natural settings (Fridberg et al, 2022;Piasecki, 2019;Russell et al, 2022). The results of the current article offer the first evidence to our knowledge supporting the utility of TAC features in detecting individual differences in drinking behaviors such as PBS and partially explaining differences in consequence risk associated with the frequency of PBS use.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Just-in-time adaptive interventions (JITAIs) are designed to provide the right support at the right time [43]. There was much discussion about how the continuous monitoring provided by the Skyn biosensor could lead to real-time intervention, indicating that it may fit well into a JITAI [44]. In this context, individuals could help to design their own intervention features, including TAC limits at which they receive alerts and whom their data are shared with (eg, should a counselor also receive the alert?).…”
Section: Principal Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%