2019
DOI: 10.1007/s40778-019-00163-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Examining Resources, Initiatives, and Regulatory Pathways to Advance Regenerative Medicine Manufacturing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite these advances, according to several technology road maps developed by the regenerative medicine industry, scalable and adaptable culture methods that employ cost-effective, chemically defined substrates are still needed to generate the large quantities of cells required for downstream applications in disease modeling, drug screening, and cell-based therapies. More specifically, current biomanufacturing techniques are limited by the following. First, current differentiation protocols employ undefined substrates such as Matrigel or extracellular matrix proteins (ECMPs) isolated from animal sources. In turn, such heterogeneous xenogeneic components not only pose a risk of transmitting adventitious pathogens but also suffer from batch-to-batch variability, which might limit their compatibility with downstream clinical applications. , Second, conventional astrocyte generation strategies employ traditional two-dimensional (2D) culture techniques, which do not allow for production of large cell quantities needed for drug screening and cell-based therapies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite these advances, according to several technology road maps developed by the regenerative medicine industry, scalable and adaptable culture methods that employ cost-effective, chemically defined substrates are still needed to generate the large quantities of cells required for downstream applications in disease modeling, drug screening, and cell-based therapies. More specifically, current biomanufacturing techniques are limited by the following. First, current differentiation protocols employ undefined substrates such as Matrigel or extracellular matrix proteins (ECMPs) isolated from animal sources. In turn, such heterogeneous xenogeneic components not only pose a risk of transmitting adventitious pathogens but also suffer from batch-to-batch variability, which might limit their compatibility with downstream clinical applications. , Second, conventional astrocyte generation strategies employ traditional two-dimensional (2D) culture techniques, which do not allow for production of large cell quantities needed for drug screening and cell-based therapies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent perspective article examines the resources, initiatives, and regulatory pathways to advance regenerative medicine manufacturing. 2 A critical challenge facing the field is developing processes and platform technologies that can cost effectively scale-up/out the expansion of cells for allogenic (on the order of billions) or autologous (patient specific). 3,4 Upstream and downstream manufacturing processes are also critical to scale-related analysis, as each is dependent on maintaining the desired phenotype throughout the manufacturing process.…”
Section: Cell Manufacturing and Scale-up/outmentioning
confidence: 99%