2014
DOI: 10.1007/s11162-014-9360-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Examining the Effects of Institutional and Cohort Characteristics on Retention Rates

Abstract: Despite being criticized as unrepresentative and misleading, retention and graduation rates are an important part of college-search web sites and accountability systems, and they frequently have been used as indicators of institutional quality and effectiveness in educational research. Retention and graduation rates are often compared over time and across institutions. However, such comparisons can be confounded by differences in entering student cohorts and differences among the institutions being compared. T… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
16
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
16
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the results presented by the author, the institutional influence on the student's propensity for dropping out is therefore modest. In the same sense, the results of the research presented by Pike and Graunke (2015) emphasize student variables in particular vocational and career issues. Tinto and Cullen (1973) report that evidence-based studies of dropout in only one institution have serious limitations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…According to the results presented by the author, the institutional influence on the student's propensity for dropping out is therefore modest. In the same sense, the results of the research presented by Pike and Graunke (2015) emphasize student variables in particular vocational and career issues. Tinto and Cullen (1973) report that evidence-based studies of dropout in only one institution have serious limitations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Our principal interest is to understand how meso (university level) and macro (national level) contexts interact with micro phenomena such as students' careers (Pike & Graunke, 2015). In order to achieve this aim, the paper shows a secondary analysis of longitudinal administrative data by means of SA and EH.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More generally, student characteristics that affect 4-year degree completion include race, gender, age, socioeconomic status (SES), and enrollment intensity (part-time vs. full-time) (Gayles & Ampaw, 2014; Pike, 2013; Pike & Graunke, 2015; Titus, 2006, 2009). Variables were collected from the IPEDS Fall Enrollment survey to capture the percent of total fall enrollment of students from each of the following racial groups: Asian, Native Hawaiian, or Pacific Islander; Black/African American; Hispanic/Latino; and American Indian/Alaska Native with White students as the omitted category.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%