2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2021.167948
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exchange coupling and dipolar interactions in FINEMET/Fe50Pd50 composites ribbons

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the GMI curves of the bare FINEMET ribbon are symmetrical. [18] Because the FINEMET ribbon and FePd film have different magnetic structures, the FePd film with the longitudinal structure generates a bias field (H b ) on the FINEMET ribbon. The generation mechanism of the H b is the dipole-dipole interactions between the FePd film and the FINEMET ribbon.…”
Section: Experimental Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the GMI curves of the bare FINEMET ribbon are symmetrical. [18] Because the FINEMET ribbon and FePd film have different magnetic structures, the FePd film with the longitudinal structure generates a bias field (H b ) on the FINEMET ribbon. The generation mechanism of the H b is the dipole-dipole interactions between the FePd film and the FINEMET ribbon.…”
Section: Experimental Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the magnetic sensors, the magnetizations of soft magnetic materials are modulated by exchange coupling and magnetic dipole interactions in the external magnetic field. [18] The dipolar interactions are long-range interactions that can strongly modify the magnetic response of the system to external excitation. [19] The explanations for the AGMI of composite materials mainly focus on exchange coupling and ignore the magnetic dipole interactions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The magnetic properties and inter-layer coupling of Fe-based composite ribbon strips have also been investigated. In order to analyze the change in MI curves as a result of different thicknesses of coatings, the effect of various thicknesses of Fe 50 Pt 50 , FePd, IGZO, and FeGa on the surface of Fe-based ribbons (width, 0.6-3 mm) by magnetron sputtering have been evaluated [23][24][25][26]. Research results show that there is an optimal thickness of coatings for the best MI effect.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Manifestations ascribed to the interlayer magnetic interactions have been reported in the last years through different ways, ranging from techniques probing the quasi-static magnetic properties, as the familiar magnetometry [14][15][16] and the magnetoresistance [17][18][19] , till the dynamic magnetic response, considering for instance the effects of ferromagnetic resonance [20][21][22] and magnetoimpedance 23,24 . Of our concern, here we concentrate on the magnetoimpedance effect (MI).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although much effort has been made to the exploration of magnetic materials with specific features for application as sensor elements in devices, MI has yet been taken as a playground for investigations on the physics behind the effect and the mechanisms controlling the dynamic magnetic response. More recently, it has been shown that materials exhibiting asymmetric magnetoimpedance (AMI) effect, such as wires [29][30][31] , ribbons 23,24,[32][33][34] , and films [35][36][37][38][39][40][41] , arise as promising candidates for applications, opening possibilities for the use of this kind of materials in auto-biased linear magnetic field sensors. Remarkably, for biphase ferromagnetic systems, with hard and soft ferromagnetic phases intermediated by a non-magnetic layer acting together, AMI has been linked with the existence of interactions between magnetic layers 27,28 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%