1995
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.51.4858
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exciton localization by magnetic polarons and alloy fluctuations in the diluted magnetic semiconductorCd1x

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

4
29
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
4
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus the FWHM broadening for x = 0.3 due to composition disorder tends to be 13.9 meV. As the calculated value of band-gap energy standard deviation σ E ≈ 6 meV characterizes the fluctuations of random potential profile in the compound, this fact strongly supports the idea of excitons localized by disorder fluctuations in A II 1−x Mn x B VI compounds with higher Mn mole fraction [12][13][14]. Several other authors [15,16] arrive at the same relation for disorder-induced FWHM value, though using different probability expressions to describe the composition fluctuations of the compound from the mean value.…”
Section: Luminescence Line Analysissupporting
confidence: 65%
“…Thus the FWHM broadening for x = 0.3 due to composition disorder tends to be 13.9 meV. As the calculated value of band-gap energy standard deviation σ E ≈ 6 meV characterizes the fluctuations of random potential profile in the compound, this fact strongly supports the idea of excitons localized by disorder fluctuations in A II 1−x Mn x B VI compounds with higher Mn mole fraction [12][13][14]. Several other authors [15,16] arrive at the same relation for disorder-induced FWHM value, though using different probability expressions to describe the composition fluctuations of the compound from the mean value.…”
Section: Luminescence Line Analysissupporting
confidence: 65%
“…At low temperature, the presence of the EMP bound to a neutral acceptor, which was termed as a bound magnetic polaron (BMP), was reported [2]. In addition, when the Mn concentration increases, an alloy potential fluctuation (APF) produced by an inhomogeneous spatial distribution of Mn ions localizes an exciton, so that the localized exciton magnetic polaron (LMP) comes to play an important role regarding optical properties, particularly in luminescent processes [2][3][4][5][6][7][8]. At low Mn concentration, the photoluminescence (PL) of the EMP bound to neutral accepters was observed [2,3,6,8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In addition, when the Mn concentration increases, an alloy potential fluctuation (APF) produced by an inhomogeneous spatial distribution of Mn ions localizes an exciton, so that the localized exciton magnetic polaron (LMP) comes to play an important role regarding optical properties, particularly in luminescent processes [2][3][4][5][6][7][8]. At low Mn concentration, the photoluminescence (PL) of the EMP bound to neutral accepters was observed [2,3,6,8]. By increasing the Mn concentration, the LMP became dominant in the PL spectrum [4][5][6][7][8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In turn, these aligned local moments act back on the exciton's spin, which lowers the exciton's energy, further localizes the exciton, and further stabilizes the polaron. The stability and binding energy of EMPs therefore depends on the detailed interplay between many factors including the exciton lifetime, the polaron formation time, the exchange field B ex , sample dimensionality, and temperature.EMPs and collective magnetic phenomena have been experimentally studied in a variety of Mn 2+ -doped semiconductor nanostructures, including CdMnSe and CdMnTe-based epilayers and quantum wells [34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42], selfassembled CdMnSe and CdMnTe quantum dots grown by molecular-beam epitaxy [14][15][16][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25], and most recently in CdMnSe nanocrystals synthesized via colloidal techniques [8,28]. Common measurement techniques include the analysis of conventional (i.e., non-resonant) PL [8, 14, 15,18,21,28,39] and time-resolved PL [8, 16,28,34,35,40].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Common measurement techniques include the analysis of conventional (i.e., non-resonant) PL [8, 14, 15,18,21,28,39] and time-resolved PL [8, 16,28,34,35,40].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%