1985
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.32.8465
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Excitons trapped at impurity centers in highly ionic crystals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
119
1
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 164 publications
(125 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
4
119
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…7 have demonstrated that when the lowest energy 5d state of Ce 3+ is located below but close to the conduction band minimum ͑typically 0.5-0.1 eV͒, the photocurrent intensity upon 5d excitation becomes strongly temperature dependent due to a thermally stimulated ionization process. Other studies [13][14][15] have shown that when the lowest energy 5d states are far below the conduction band minimum ͑typically Ͼ1 eV͒, 5d states do not show up in the photocurrent excitation spectrum. The fact that the absorption and photocurrent excitation spectra of LaAlO 3 :Ce 3+ are identical and that the photocurrent spectrum is temperature independent suggests that the lowest energy 5d state Ce 3+ is located inside the CB of LaAlO 3 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 have demonstrated that when the lowest energy 5d state of Ce 3+ is located below but close to the conduction band minimum ͑typically 0.5-0.1 eV͒, the photocurrent intensity upon 5d excitation becomes strongly temperature dependent due to a thermally stimulated ionization process. Other studies [13][14][15] have shown that when the lowest energy 5d states are far below the conduction band minimum ͑typically Ͼ1 eV͒, 5d states do not show up in the photocurrent excitation spectrum. The fact that the absorption and photocurrent excitation spectra of LaAlO 3 :Ce 3+ are identical and that the photocurrent spectrum is temperature independent suggests that the lowest energy 5d state Ce 3+ is located inside the CB of LaAlO 3 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas the latter can be considered impurity levels, the delocalized nature of the 5f 1 7s 1 states indicates that they might be considered U 4+ trapped excitons, using the terminology proposed by McClure and Pedrini. 33 Furthermore, some members of the 5f n−1 6d͑e g ͒ 1 set seem to be notably influenced by the 5f 1 7s 1 states through a considerable interconfigurational mixing. All of this makes the electronic structure of the levels lying at high energies more complex than that of isomorphous and similar systems studied before ͑like Cs 2 ZrCl 6 :Pa 4+ , Cs 2 NaYCl 6 :U 3+ , and Cs 2 ZrCl 6 :U 4+ , from Refs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A 21 and A 31 are the radiative rates from the ITE levels. exciton state (3) and radiatively decay to the ytterbium ground state (1). The second process is the IR pulse liberating electrons from trap states to the conduction band (C) where they recombine with ytterbium ions to form impurity-trapped excitons in the lower exciton state (2) which radiates to the ytterbium ground state (1).…”
Section: E Analysis Of Emission Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ITEs are bound electron-hole pairs with the hole localized on an impurity (in this case the Yb 2+ ion) and the electron on nearby lattice sites. 1 The electron has been assumed to be localized on the neighboring cations 2 but recent ab initio studies of ITE states have shown that the exciton radius may be smaller. 3,4 Many materials have ITE states that play a role in relaxation processes but studying impurity-trapped excitons in optical materials is often difficult since the ITEs that form in these systems decay predominantly nonradiatively and so have to be studied indirectly.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%