2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.orl.2016.07.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Existence of Nash equilibrium for chance-constrained games

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Motivated by recent research on robust game theory and distributinally robust finite game [1,36,31,32,2,41], we study several distributionally robust equilibrium models. We start with a distributionally robust Nash equilibrium (DRNE) model.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Motivated by recent research on robust game theory and distributinally robust finite game [1,36,31,32,2,41], we study several distributionally robust equilibrium models. We start with a distributionally robust Nash equilibrium (DRNE) model.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ahipasaoglu et al [2] study the DRO stochastic user equilibrium where the players only have the information of the first and second moments of the random variables. Singh et al [41] consider robust finite chance-constrained games and study the existence of mixed-strategy Nash equilibrium. Along that direction, Loizou [31,32] proposes a distributionally robust Nash equilibirum model with each player's objective being Conditional Value at Risk (CVaR for short).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the uncertainties involving random variables, the expected payoff criterion is used in case of risk neutral players [15,16,19,26,35,36] and the risk measures CVaR and variance are used in the risk averse case [10,18,26]. For finite strategic games with random payoffs, Singh et al [29,30,31] introduced a chance constraint programming based payoff criterion. It captures a situation where players are guaranteed to get the payoffs with a certain confidence level.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It captures a situation where players are guaranteed to get the payoffs with a certain confidence level. There exists a mixed strategy Nash equilibrium of a chance-constrained game if the payoff vector of each player follows a multivariate elliptically symmetric distribution [29]. Such a Nash equilibrium can be computed by solving an equivalent mathematical program [31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For risk averse players, the payoff criterion with the risk measure CVaR [14,20] and the variance was considered in the literature [6]. Singh et al [22,24] considered a finite strategic game where the payoff vector of each player is a random vector.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%