2008
DOI: 10.1080/14649880701811385
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exit the State: Decentralization and the Need for Local Social, Political, and Economic Considerations in Water Resource Allocation in Madagascar and Kenya1

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Dreher and Fischer (2008), in a cross-country analysis of the effects of decentralization, reported that decentralization acted as a disincentive for transnational terror. Marcus and Onjala (2008) in a study of the decentralization in Ambovombe District (Madagascar) and Tana River District (Kenya) report that decentralization with community participation holds the potential to increase accountability of the resource management process, improve governance and leadership accountability, and maximize resources in a sustainable fashion.…”
Section: Theoretical and Empirical Literaturementioning
confidence: 98%
“…Dreher and Fischer (2008), in a cross-country analysis of the effects of decentralization, reported that decentralization acted as a disincentive for transnational terror. Marcus and Onjala (2008) in a study of the decentralization in Ambovombe District (Madagascar) and Tana River District (Kenya) report that decentralization with community participation holds the potential to increase accountability of the resource management process, improve governance and leadership accountability, and maximize resources in a sustainable fashion.…”
Section: Theoretical and Empirical Literaturementioning
confidence: 98%
“…Although community participation and management seems to be a useful tool for sustainable rural water resources management [22][23][24]. In the current study, it was observed that most of the sustainability related problems were mainly due to poor community management as also was reflected by PLS model, indicating that organization issue has a great load on project sustainability ( Figure 5).…”
Section: Lessons Learnedmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The experience of Singapore shows that, although it started to decentralize some HRM elements in 1983, it was only in 1995 that the government gave the civil service organizations substantial freedom or discretion on issues related to HR activities. This restabilization, in turn, strengthened monitoring and evaluation mechanisms and centralized some previously decentralized HR functions since the late 1990s to keep the civil service unified (also see Marcu & Onjala, 2008;Siggelkow & Levinthal, 2003). a closer examination of Table 1 also indicates that decentralization of HR functions was needed in the 1980s mainly because of competition from the private sector, the supply of new management ideas, global economic forces, and budget cuts (e.g., Moore, 1996;Perry, Mesch, & Paarlberg, 2006;Reeves, 2006;Rockwell, 2005;Shafritz et al, 2001).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%