Expanding Value Driven Design to Meet Lean Product Service Development

Bertoni, Alessandro; Bertoni, Marco; Panarotto, Massimo; Johansson, Christian; Larsson, Tobias

doi:10.1016/j.procir.2015.02.153

Cited by 18 publications

(9 citation statements)

References 33 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The Value Driving Design aims to focus the design solution according to the customer value. Therefore, it provides methods and tools that take the value as a basis of measurement for selecting and evaluating the optimal configuration for the operations and the tasks of the design work [30].…”

Section: Methods Of Design Integrating Lean Performance Criteriamentioning

confidence: 99%

Lean system design framework based on lean functionalities and criteria integration in production machines design phase

Slim¹,

Houssin²,

Coulibaly³

et al. 2021

FME Transactions

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Manufacturing needs more and more requirements (sustainability, agility, Industry 4.0 technologies, etc.) to meet customer demands. Nowadays, companies apply Lean tools to improve machines and systems performance in their use phase. Lean tools application on existing machines ensures some functionalities like (Reduce changeover time, eliminate wastes, Involve Human Skills, etc.). The purpose of this paper is to offer designers a design support method and tool to design a performant system (production system, machines, etc.) by integrating Lean functionalities from the early design phases, with a minimum of needs to improve the system in the use phase via Lean. For this purpose, we analyze the Lean principles and tools to identify functionalities provided by Lean. These functionalities are analyzed and classified to integrate them into the design of manufacturing systems in the context of Industry 4.0. A "Lean-System-Design" approach defines a systematic and detailed guide for the integration of Lean from the early design phase. We provide the software tool specifications, which represent the first steps of its implementation. We have illustrated our proposal with a case study on the design of a waste treatment machine.

show abstract

Section: Methods Of Design Integrating Lean Performance Criteriamentioning

confidence: 99%

Lean system design framework based on lean functionalities and criteria integration in production machines design phase

Slim¹,

Houssin²,

Coulibaly³

et al. 2021

FME Transactions

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…and, separately, goalfunction tree. Twenty two sources that focused on value modeling were included in this research as of January 2019 [3], [12], [16], [20], [31]- [33], [35], [38], [47], [56]- [67]. The set of available literature for GFTs was significantly smaller than for value modeling due to GFT's recent introduction and limited use, predominantly by NASA.…”

Section: A Content Analysis: Defining Terminology and Creating Defini...mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The twenty-five most frequent words for each literature set are included in Appendix C. From these frequent words lists, the elements of the models were identified. Tables 1 and 2 present the elements, compiled definitions from statements in the sources, and corresponding references for value models [3], [12], [16], [20], [31]- [33], [35], [38], [47], [56]- [67] and GFTs respectively [4], [6], [7], [68]. If a definition was identified in the sources, it appears in Tables 1 and 2.…”

Section: A Establishing Value Model and Gft Terminologymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…[60] Gives a scalar score to any set of attributes; beneficial in their way to work as 'coordinative artifacts' serving as basis for conversation and knowledge sharing within the crossfunctional design team. [56] Rates the engineered system's design attributes as inputs and outputs a scalar score indicating system expected value. [62] Provide total ordering of the space as well as the sensitivity of each subsystem to the whole.…”

Section: Table I Value Model Terminology and Definitions Term Definitionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The Relationship Between Goal-Function Trees and Value Models

Eaton

Mesmer

2023

IEEE Open J. Syst. Eng.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Systems often inspire the development of new models to manage size and complexity challenges in system development. Engineers should be aware of overlap in the models used for systems engineering of systems as it would be inefficient to reiterate overlapping tasks. The objective of this paper is to identify consistencies between two models that appear to have overlapping tasks: Goal-Function Trees (GFTs) and value models. Both models are perceived to represent information about the system and stakeholder preferences, but have historically used differing processes and language. An analysis of the functional use and terminology for the two models reveals consistencies. The two models are compared in this paper using content analysis of systems engineering academic literature. It is seen that physics-based system representation and stakeholder preference incorporation are often common to both models. A coffee maker is used to illustrate the potential consistencies and overlapping tasks between the models. Extending this simple example, the applicability of the models to space systems is discussed. The findings of this article can be used by systems engineers to improve their efficiency when applying both GFTs and value models.

show abstract

“…Value assessments in PSSs have been the topic of substantial prior research. Here, particularly the work of M. and A. Bertoni and colleagues has been influential (see, e.g., Bertoni et al, 2016Bertoni et al, , 2015Bertoni et al, , 2017. Therefore, the prior work introduced here is based in part on literature studies as well as a selection from the comprehensive account of value assessment metrics for PSSs presented in Bertoni et al (2017).…”

Section: Value Assessment For Pssmentioning

confidence: 99%