2013
DOI: 10.9788/tp2013.1-03
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Expansão de repertório de relações arbitrárias em Sapajus sp. via exclusão

Abstract: O procedimento de exclusão pode expandir repertório relacional arbitrário de crianças, em condições de aprendizagem sem erros. Embora a escolha por exclusão esteja presente em diversas espécies não humanas, ela nem sempre resulta na aprendizagem de novas relações. O objetivo deste trabalho foi verifi car a escolha por exclusão em um macaco-prego e a aquisição das novas relações arbitrárias como um resultado do contexto de exclusão. O sujeito apresentava um repertório de 5 relações arbitrárias A-B e suas simétr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, accurate selections of theta or upsilon remained dependent on the presence of pi to be excluded and did not lead to learning of the new relations between the words "theta" and "upsilon" and the corresponding letters (actually, Dixon repeated the procedure with other stimulus sets, and found that learning of new discriminations increased in probability). Similar outcomes were often obtained (Campos, Brino, & Galvão, 2013;Clement & Zentall, 2003;Domeniconi, et al, 2007). However, learning by exclusion was reported in other studies (e.g., Cabral, Assis, & Haydu, 2012;Ferrari, de Rose, & McIlvane, 1993;McIlvane & Stoddard, 1981).…”
supporting
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, accurate selections of theta or upsilon remained dependent on the presence of pi to be excluded and did not lead to learning of the new relations between the words "theta" and "upsilon" and the corresponding letters (actually, Dixon repeated the procedure with other stimulus sets, and found that learning of new discriminations increased in probability). Similar outcomes were often obtained (Campos, Brino, & Galvão, 2013;Clement & Zentall, 2003;Domeniconi, et al, 2007). However, learning by exclusion was reported in other studies (e.g., Cabral, Assis, & Haydu, 2012;Ferrari, de Rose, & McIlvane, 1993;McIlvane & Stoddard, 1981).…”
supporting
confidence: 85%
“…However, accuracy increased in the subsequent cycles, in which Pandora, Greg, and Cronos showed results consistent with learning. Therefore, the most important variable determining learning was not direct reinforcement of the responses to undefined stimuli, but repeated responses away from the defined S − s. These results confirm that exclusion may produce learning and that learning by exclusion seems to require more than one exclusion trial (Antoniazzi, Domeniconi, & Schmidt, 2014;Bion, Borovsky, & Fernald, 2013;Campos et al, 2013;Clement & Zentall, 2003;Dixon, 1977;Domeniconi et al, 2007;Wilkinson & McIlvane, 1997).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, Tico, who exhibited the best performances and required the smaller I/D ratios, was the youngest monkey and had an extensive training history of tool usage (Delage, ). By contrast, Raul had a longer history in tasks of choice with two‐dimensional stimuli as in the present study (Brino et al, ; Brino, Campos, et al, 2014; Brino et al, ; Brino, Galvão, et al, 2014; Campos et al, ). Notably, Raul proved capable of acquiring arbitrary relations in DMTS tasks that Dracula could not.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 47%
“…In studies reported by Brino et al (2010) and Campos, Brino, and Galvão (2013), the capuchin acquired generalized identity matching (IDMTS), multiple arbitrary matching (ARBMTS), and MTS baselines, demonstrating that reject control could be developed via blank comparison (mask) procedures (McIlvane, Kledaras, Munson, King, de Rose, & Stoddard, 1987). The present study exploited this unusually well-developed baseline in an effort to analyze stimulus control topographies, supporting a positive outcome on a test for emergent symmetry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%